British Students Learn Shocking Truth about Unite Against Fascism UAF

Daily Bale

The Shocking Truth – British Left Wing Anti Fascists Used the Muslims and Race Just to Gain Power for Themselves.

In reality the so called left wing Anti Fascists and politically correct left wing freaks are just as Fascist if not more so than the people they say they are against, and they use peoples race and religion in minorities as a tool to attack the right wing with, but in reality they care nothing for the races or religions ‘they pretend to defend’ – they have just been using people and minorities to further their own left wing agenda.

Evil Beyond Belief !

This is a sickening revelation and one that will horrify those that thought the left wing Anti Fascists stood for equal rights or indeed any rights at all, never mind minority rights or equality.

The left wing Anti Fascists have been using Muslims as a way to strengthen their ranks by saying that they stand for the rights of Muslims, when in actual fact if the left wing Anti Fascist Communists got their way, then the very last thing they would tolerate is Muslims or any other religion for that matter.

Remember how the Communists have treated Muslims in Communist regimes around the world in past history, do you think for one minute that if the UAF or ‘Hope Not Hate’ organisations got their way in the UK then anything would be any different to how they have treated Muslims in the past ?

After the Rotherham atrocities we now see that ‘Hope Not Hate’ very quickly started to change its Blog posts and are now making themselves to look like they are against grooming gangs e.c.t, where before the Rotherham cases came to light publicly, they attacked anybody who tried to expose what was going on concerning grooming gangs, because they wanted to retain the Muslims belief that they were on their side, but now look what they are doing here on their Blog.

http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/news/jihad/

None of this existed on their Blog before the Rotherham grooming gangs came to public attention, but now they are keen to be seen to be almost on a level with the English Defence League !

We wonder how British Muslims feel about this now ?

It is one thing to be patronised by left wing Anti Fascist Communists, but to be used by them too !

We must also bring to attention what the Communists did in Afghanistan during the Russian occupation of that country, do we need to say any more here we wonder ?

Well just read on, but we warn you, what you are about to read will anger you and shock you, but you need to know just what these people who call themselves ‘Anti Fascists’ really are in truth.

Hope not hate. U.A.F

Evil sick Left-wing Marxist Fascists.

Some time ago, the ‘anti-fascist’ group Unite Against Fascism (UAF) sent a letter to the the BBC demanding that it implement what you could only call its Lesser Gulag Policy; or, as they call it, the ‘no platform policy’.

It demanded that the BBC – and all other media outlets – never interview anyone who is in any way critical of Islam or of the behaviour of Muslims (as Muslims). That the UAF did this was an incredible screech of hypocrisy.

They simply didn’t get the irony of demanding such a fascist measure to silence what they deemed to be ‘fascists’ (the UAF’s set of fascists has very many members and as has now come to light, the whole organisation is fascist and totalitarian).

Unite Against Fascism

So who or what is Unite Against Fascism?

Primarily, UAF is a front group for the Socialist Workers’ Party (SWP), which is a Trotskyist revolutionary group that used to severely patronise the British working class until Muslims, in large numbers, came on the British scene.

Now it feeds off potential Muslim radicalism at the same time as wanting – or expecting – Muslims to turn into Marxist revolutionaries as some kind of payback for their condescension and political help.

Can you believe that?

You really should believe it because an awful lot more people besides yourself have been taken in by these left wing Marxist Communist fascists and thugs.

(Unite Against Fascism was formed in late 2003 when the SWP invented – or adopted – the notion of ‘Islamophobia’ in order to politicise young Muslims – as well as loads of gullible and privileged university students – into their revolutionary struggle against capitalism)

UAF claims that its primary purpose is to fight against fascism.

In its own words, it’s an “anti-fascist organisation in the United Kingdom that campaigns against right wing and fascist organisations in Britain”.

Do you see now?

UAF is against all examples of fascism … except brown fascism, black fascism, Islamofascism, Arab fascism and its own red fascism. Let us explain further.

UAF is against all the examples of ‘fascism’ displayed by white people – primarily when displayed by the British working class (or at least working class ‘fascism’ takes up most of the time of UAF’s predominately white, middle-class members).

So what’s the best way for UAF to silence all critics of Islam and Muslims (as Muslims) ?

Simple. Call all of them – and I mean all of them! – ‘fascist’ and/ or ‘racist’ (or try the new word-weapon: ‘Islamophobe’).

Accusing all your political enemies of being ‘fascists’, ‘racists’ or ‘Islamophobes’ works– politically speaking.

Thus UAF uses these words, and others, very often. And according to Jonah Goldberg, in his book Liberal Fascism, it’s clearly the case that “no one has to take a fascist seriously”.  More to the point:

You’re under no obligation to listen to a fascist’s arguments [surely he can’t have arguments] or concern yourself with his feelings or rights [he has none].

UAF Leaders

One of the honorary presidents of UAF is the well known British politician Ken Livingstone. He is now a keen supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Yusuf Al-Qaradawi.

‘Red Ken’, as he was called by the British public in the 1980s, used to focus on various and many ‘identity groups’, such as lesbians and gays, until he realised that many of his new-found Muslim friends wanted to kill some of these people.

UAF ‘Joint Secretary’, Weyman Bennett, once said that Jews –

“should go back to where they came from … New York or wherever” (a claim he’s never denied).

He’s also a member of the Central Committee – yes, Soviet Style! – of the Socialist Workers’ Party.

Some still argue that UAF has no direct connections to the SWP, despite the fact that nearly all of its leaders are members of the SWP and most of its activists are members too. It must also be noted that the SWP produces UAF’s banners and arranges just about everything it does (including its many coffee mornings).

In 2112 Unite Against Freedom elected Azad Ali to be Vice Chair of the organisation.

Azad Ali opposes democracy and supports full sharia law; he supported the killing of British and American soldiers in Iraq; he attended talks by the spiritual leader of Al Qaeda in Europe, Abu Qatada (only just deported from the UK); he wants, or wanted, Ismail Haniyeh – the leader of Hamas – to be the Caliph of the next Caliphate; and in response to being exposed by Channel 4’s Dispatches, he said to a reporter –

“We’ve got a picture of you and a lot more than you thought we had. We’ve tracked you down to different places. And if people are gonna turn what I’ve just said into a threat, that’s their fault, innit?”

But despite all that (all ye of little faith), UAF stresses that many of its signatories and members are not SWP members or Islamists – and that, bizarrely enough, is absolutely true!

They include Sir Teddy Taylor MP (who apparently likes Bob Marley) and the British Prime Minister himself, David Cameron.

Because they are only signatories, rather than activists, they do not do much, or anything, for UAF other than appear – or at least their names do – on its website.

Nonetheless, it was rumoured that Sir Teddy Taylor originally thought that UAF was a reggae band.

As for Cameron, some say that he still supports UAF because, like everyone else in mainstream British politics, he’s against ‘Islamophobia’.

We strongly advise the good and honourable Prime Minister to take his name off the UAF signatory list, the UAF are being exposed now in a big way for what they really are, and we do not believe that David Cameron, or indeed most other public figures had any idea as to the true nature of the UAF when they signed.

A Little Bit of UAF History

On the 19th of August, 2009, the British police arrested 19 UAF protesters during a demonstration in Codnor, Derbyshire.

On the 22nd of October, 2009, a UAF demonstration outside the BBC resulted in injuries to three police officers. A UAF national officer and (then) SWP National Secretary, one Martin Smith (later embroiled in rape and sexual assault charges within the SWP), was found guilty on 7th September 2010 at South Western Magistrates’ Court, London,of assaulting one of the police officers.

On the 20th of March, 2010, 55 UAF supporters were arrested, including the UAF protest organiser, Weyman Bennett, on suspicion of conspiracy to commit violent disorder in the English town of Bolton. The police blamed “people predominantly associated with UAF for provoking violence” and said that they “acted with, at times, extreme violence”.

Finally, and more recently 58 UAF demonstrators were arrested by police in London under Section 14 of the Public Order Act.

Why?

UAF-SWP defends literally everything Muslims do because it thinks that will help radicalise and destabilise the ‘capitalist system’, and even help to bring about their very own, very white, very middle-class, and very un-Islamic revolution.

The British working class let these middle class professionals down. It never gave them the revolution they fantasised about. The UAF-SWP therefore believes in latching onto any social movement (or even non-Western state) which is at odds with the ‘capitalist state’.

Thus they even support Iran, as well as various misogynists, killers, homophobes, rapists, terrorists, etc. As long as these nice people have brown skin and are against Western capitalism they will support them.

UAF is the mirror image of the ‘fascists’ and ‘Nazis’ they claim to be fighting against. Their fascism is displayed in the desire to suppress freedom of speech; in the use of violence; in political totalitarianism; and even in racism (i.e., racism against whites and Jews, as well as positive – or ‘inverted’ – racism towards blacks, Muslims, etc.).

That’s why the members of UAF are obsessed by Nazis/ fascists – they don’t like the mirror’s reflection of their own Nazism/ fascism.

Their seeing fascism everywhere is a psychological projection of their own tendencies onto others. Just as many Puritans saw sex everywhere because they were often sex-obsessed, so the UAF sees racism and fascism everywhere because they are often racist and always fascist themselves.

Indeed the International Socialists of UAF-SWP are fighting the National Socialists (Nazis) over the same political bones: the promise of zero unemployment, selfless leaders, a perfect society, classlessness or class equality, the defeat of ‘Zionists’, the annihilation of the capitalist order (Das System) and the death and destruction of all their numerous enemies.

Evil Beyond Imagination.

 

Politically Correct Crimes by Left-wing Anti-fascists Marxists Communists Antifa

Daily Bale

People ask us why the Daily Bale exists, and what it stands for, and why we target the left-wing.  

They ask us if it is moral of us to target the left-wing, after all, they only want what is best for everybody don’t they??

The UAF and Hope Not Hate anti-fascist organisations only want to stand up for equality and human rights don’t they ??

The anti-fascists who use violence at demonstrations, throw darts at people, deface and smash up war memorials are good decent people aren’t they??

9263490-large

The left-wing anti-fascist organisations in the U.K who post people’s names and addresses on their websites and publicly name their places of work, harass their families and friends, and try to force them into silence by bullying, intimidation, manipulation and what amounts to terror tactics, all these things are good, right, moral and are acts carried out by decent upstanding people, right??

The left-wing anti-fascists who use anonymous accounts on social networking sites like Twitter and Facebook, to attack, name, shame and harass anybody who does not agree with them or who will not obey or bow to left-wing bullying and politically correct codes of speech, thought or perception of the world as the left-wing freaks see it, these are all good decent people behind those ‘anonymous’ accounts, right??

Below you will find a list, with links, of just some of the left-wing episodes of mass terror, murder, torture and injustices throughout the world in periods of history, and just a fraction of the levels and murderous madness that these evil sick left-wing sadists are willing to sink to in their vile warped depraved quest to take away all human rights, freedom of speech, and to destroy any real true equality amongst humankind. 

Rotherham child grooming gangs

Left-Wing politically correct evil and left-wing anti-fascist perversion is not just confined to the United Kingdom and neither is it a new thing that has only just come to light as the people begin to wake up to the injustice and hypocrisy of left-wing political correctness and anti-fascism in Britain.

Left-wing evil, left-wing mass murder and left-wing torture of those who oppose leftism or happen to have a different opinion to leftists have been happening for a very long time in the name of left-wing ideals in whatever evil form of ideology they come in and have been responsible for hundreds of millions of deaths throughout the world.

The left-wing hateful spiteful angry evil sick twisted vengeful manipulators intimidators and bullies will always hide behind the mask of some cause or moral sounding guise, like ‘anti-fascism’ or ‘feminism’ they also use race as one of their main tools in causing division and hatred, by calling people race hate names and turning one race against another in order to gain the upper hand within the ‘divide and rule’ principle.

Most people do not realise this, but the very people who they think are the defenders of equality and supposedly stand for anti-racist and anti-fascist ideals – are actually very much fascist and racist themselves.

The left-wing will always attack Nationalists and Patriots in whatever form, because they know that Nationalism and Patriotism brings people together in community spirit, and the left-wing are much more likely to be exposed in a climate of National identity and togetherness.

Not convinced ? Then just look at one example within the U.K of left-wing unwarranted aggression towards democratic political parties, like the relentless left-wing attacks upon Ukip, a political party that in itself contains many different races and identities and symbolises bringing people together in National identity.

Radical leftists would have us believe that they stand for democracy, progress, human rights and social justice.

But when they seize power, they introduce slavery, terror, famine, concentration camps and mass murder.

UAF

A list of just some of the evil crimes carried out by left-wing ideologies in the name of Political Correctness, Communism, Marxism, Trotskyism and Socialism

Please feel free to share this list of left-wing atrocities by using the links at the foot of this post.

As the Marxists used to say, ‘our terror is no accident’  General John Kekes,  Why Robespierre Chose Terror

The human costs of far-left ideology during the Jacobin Terror in France: “A remarkable feature of the ideological frame of mind is that those in its grip actually believe these justifications for disemboweling, lynching, mutilating, burying alive, drowning, and hacking to pieces their unfortunate victims.”

Elizabeth Anderson, Babeuf’s Revolutionary Communism

An early example of radical left-wing totalitarianism.

Paul Bogdanor, The Communists As They Really Are

Quotations not taught in the average history class.

Murray Rothbard, The Myth of Democratic Socialism [PDF]
George Reisman, The Tyranny of Socialism [PDF]
Thomas G. West, Marx and Lenin
Leszek Kolakowski, Marxist Roots of Stalinism [PDF]
Roger Scruton, What is Right? [PDF]

Why radical left-wing ideology ends in horrifying dictatorships.

Stéphane Courtois, The Crimes of Communism
Stéphane Courtois, Why?
Paul Hollander, The Distinctive Features of Repression in Communist States [PDF]

Analyses of communist tyranny and mass murder all over the world.

Karl Zinsmeister, All the Hungry People
David Marcus, Famine Crimes in International Law [PDF]
Murray Rothbard, The Politics of Famine

The role of communist dictatorships in creating the most terrible famines in world history.

Steven Bela Vardy and Agnes Huszar Vardy, Cannibalism in Stalin’s Russia and Mao’s China [PDF]

Cannibalism was one of the countless horrors awaiting the victims of communist famines and purges.

Soviet UnionMichael Johns, Seventy Years of Evil

Soviet crimes against humanity from the Bolshevik coup to the slaughter in Afghanistan.

– Pre-StalinVladimir Medem, On Terror [PDF]
Sergei Melgunov, The Red Terror in Russia [PDF]
Sergei Melgunov, The Record of the Red Terror [PDF]
G. P. Maximoff, The Guillotine At Work
Nicolas Walter, The Legacy of Bolshevism [PDF]
Richard Pipes, Lenin’s Gulag [PDF]

Lenin and Trotsky tortured and massacred hundreds of thousands after 1917.

Peter Boettke, The Soviet Experiment With Pure Communism [PDF]
Peter Boettke, The Political Economy of Utopia: Communism in Soviet Russia, 1918-1921 [PDF]
Peter Boettke, Soviet Admissions: Communism Doesn’t Work

Lenin, Trotsky, Bukharin and other Soviet planners admitted to inflicting catastrophe on tens of millions.

Leszek Kolakowski, Trotsky on Dictatorship [PDF]
Ralph Raico, Trotsky: The Ignorance and the Evil
John Eric Marot, Trotsky, the Left Opposition and the Rise of Stalinism: Theory and Practice

The bloodthirsty Trotskyist “alternative” to Stalinism.

– GenocidesInquiry Reveals Lenin Unleashed Systematic Murder of 200,000 Clergy
Communist Reign of Terror Killed 200,000 Clergymen

Victims were “crucified on royal gates and shot in the basements of the Cheka, scalped, strangled, drowned and submitted to other bestial tortures.”

Soviet Order to Exterminate Cossacks is Unearthed
Peter Holquist, “Conduct Merciless Mass Terror”: Decossackization on the Don, 1919

Bolshevik genocide against the Don Cossacks.

Samuel D. Sinner, The Open Wound: The Genocide of German Ethnic Minorities in Russia and the Soviet Union
Samuel D. Sinner, The German-Russian Genocide: Remembrance in the 21st Century [PDF]

Atrocities included “mass rape of the elderly, women and children, mass drownings, prolonged torture sessions, mutilations, hacking up of bodies, mass shootings of hundreds, even thousands in a single action, the holocaust of entire villages – including the burning of all inhabitants and building structures.”

Edige Kirimal, Complete Destruction of National Groups as Groups: The Crimean Turks
Aurelie Campana, Surgun: The Crimean Tatars’ Deportation and Exile [PDF]

Massacres, famines and ethnic cleansing wiped out hundreds of thousands of Crimean Muslims.

Aleksandr M. Nekrich, The Punished Peoples [PDF]
Aurelie Campana, The Massive Deportation of the Chechen People [PDF]
Elza-Bair Guchinova, Deportation of the Kalmyks (1943–1956) [PDF]
For Victims of Stalin’s Deportations, War Lives On

Genocidal deportations of national minorities created an apartheid system that lasted for decades.

– FaminesRoman Serbyn, Famine in Ukraine

Summary of the 1921 and 1933 famines.

Kazuo Nakai, Soviet Agricultural Policies in the Ukraine and the 1921-1922 Famine [PDF]
Roman Serbyn, The First Man-Made Famine in Soviet Ukraine, 1921-1923

Forgotten communist famine, in which millions died.

Simon Ertz, The Kazakh Catastrophe and Stalin’s Order of Priorities 1929-1933 [PDF]
Isabelle Ohayon, The Kazakh Famine [PDF]
Yedige Magauin, A Tragedy Kazakhstan Must Never Forget

Forced starvation killed a third of the population of Kazakhstan.

Raphael Lemkin, Soviet Genocide in Ukraine [PDF]
Roman Serbyn, The Ukrainian Famine of 1932-1933 as Genocide in the Light of the UN Convention [PDF]
Roman Serbyn, Is There a “Smoking Gun” For the Holodomor?
Roman Serbyn, The Holodomor: Reflections on the Ukrainian Genocide [PDF]
Nicolas Werth, The Great Ukrainian Famine of 1932-33 [PDF]
Stanislav Kulchytsky, The Ukrainian Famine of 1932-1933: A Case of Genocide [PDF]
Yevhen Zakharov, Legal Classification of Holodomor 1932-1933 in Ukraine and in Kuban

Forced starvation decimated the Ukrainian population.

D’Ann Penner, The Agrarian “Strike” of 1932-33 [PDF]
D’Ann Penner, Stalin and the Ital’ianka of 1932-1933 in the Don Region
Michael Ellman, The Role of Leadership Perceptions and of Intent in the Soviet Famine of 1931-1934 [PDF]
Michael Ellman, Stalin and the Soviet Famine of 1932-33 Revisited [PDF]
Sergei Maksudov, Genocide Remembered
Timothy Snyder, Stalin’s World is Still With Us

This man-made famine was the worst peacetime mass murder in the history of Europe.

Michael Ellman, The 1947 Soviet Famine and the Entitlement Approach to Famines [PDF]

Another forgotten famine, in which the communists withheld food from the victims.

– PurgesNicolas Werth, Dekulakisation as Mass Violence [PDF]

The murder of half a million men, women and children for belonging to the wrong economic class.

Forest Skulls May Tell Where 30,000 Stalin Victims Lie

Example of the mass graves containing victims of the Soviet regime.

Poisons Tested on Stalin’s Prisoners

The Soviets, like the Nazis, performed medical experiments on conscious victims.

Top Soviet Denounces Stalin’s Gulags [PDF]

The true scale of the Gulag.

– Death TollsPapers on Soviet Repression Statistics
Famine Lecture Presents Findings of Holodomor Demography Research Team

Post-Cold War academic research on Soviet mass murder.

Steven Rosefielde, Documented Homicides and Excess Deaths [PDF]

Demonstrates that the number of killings documented in the Soviet archives was only a fraction of the total, which reached 10 million during the 1927-38 period alone.

– Post-StalinDavid Satter, The System of Forced Labor in Russia [PDF]
Juliana Geran Pilon, Slave Labor and the Soviet Pipeline [PDF]

Slavery in the post-Stalin Gulag.

Who Says No Soviet Concentration Camps? [PDF]
Peter Reddaway, Inside Russia’s Concentration Camps [PDF]
Alexander Shatravka, Man of Peace Finds None in Soviet Camp [PDF]
The Gulag: Lost Millions
Human Rights Survey Deplores Soviet Prison Camp Conditions [PDF]

The atrocities included forced starvation, medical neglect, systematic beatings and death by radiation.

Soviet Prisoners Exposed to Fatal Radiation in Uranium Mines
George Schopflin, Radiating a False Picture: Focus on the Difference Between Soviet PR and Reality

On the Nuclear Gulag, where victims were murdered by radiation poisoning.

Sergei Grigoryants, Soviet Psychiatric Prisoners [PDF]

On the Psychiatric Gulag, where victims were falsely imprisoned and tortured with mind-altering drugs.

Eastern EuropeJean C. Bingle, Labor For Bread [PDF]
Marek Jan Chodakiewicz, The Dialectics of Pain [PDF]

The record of Soviet mass terror against Poles.

Tamas Stark, Genocide or Genocidal Massacre? The Case of Hungarian Prisoners in Soviet Custody [PDF]
Agnes Huszar Vardy, Forgotten Victims of World War II [PDF]

The Soviets deported hundreds of thousands of Hungarians to their deaths.

Michael Portmann, Communist Retaliation and Persecution on Yugoslav Territory [PDF]
Piles of Bones in Yugoslavia Point to Partisan Massacres
Under Slovenia Lie Mass Graves

Communist mass murder in Yugoslavia, now forgotten.

Red Army Troops Raped Even Russian Women As They Freed Them From Camps
Anthony Beevor, “They Raped Every German Female From Eight to 80”
German Rape Victims Find a Voice at Last

The Red Army systematically gang-raped millions of women and girls in Eastern Europe.

Iron Curtain’s 100,000 Dead
Germans Find Mass Graves at an Ex-Soviet Camp

The Soviets used former Nazi concentration camps to wipe out political prisoners in East Germany.

Death Camps, Torture, Experiments on Children
Germany’s Guilty Secret: Beaten, Drugged, Skewered
“More Than 1,000 Died” Trying to Flee East Germany

Systematic torture, medical experiments and mass murder in East Germany.

Jeffrey Herf, An Age of Murder: Ideology and Terror in Germany [PDF]

The terrorism and antisemitism of the Stasi-sponsored Red Army Faction in West Germany.

Communist Atrocities to be Aired at Prison Camp Commander Trial
Romania Remembers Victims of Communist Gulags

Mass killings in the Romanian Gulag.

Bulgaria Ran Brutal Camps For Prisoners [PDF]

The brutality of the Bulgarian Gulag.

Justice Delayed For Those Tortured Under Communism

Torture and murder in Czechoslovakia.

AfghanistanAfghan Driver Says He Saw Soldiers Blind and Strangle Children [PDF]
Afghans Disclose Deaths of 11,000

Communist mass murder in the pre-invasion years.

Atrocities and Violations of Human Rights and International Law in Afghanistan [PDF]
Eyewitnesses to Afghanistan at War [PDF]

Accounts of terror bombing and other war crimes.

Rosanne Klass, Lifting the Curtain on Afghanistan’s Horror [PDF]
Claude Malhuret, Report From Afghanistan [PDF]

Freedom House and Doctors Without Borders describe the Nazi-style methods of the Soviet invaders, including massacre, torture, maiming and rape.

W. Michael Reisman and Charles H. Norchi, Genocide and the Soviet Occupation of Afghanistan [PDF]

The Institute for the Study of Genocide on Soviet criminal guilt.

The Soviets’ Ugly Exit [PDF]

Retreating Soviet forces scattered millions of anti-personnel mines, planted explosive devices disguised as toys in order to blow off children’s limbs, poisoned food supplies and waged chemical warfare against the civilian population.

M. Hassan Kakar, The Story of Genocide in Afghanistan

Academic history of the Soviet genocide.

ChinaTwo Millions [PDF]
Human Rights in Mainland China [PDF]
Uncounted Millions: Mass Death in Mao’s China
Scholars Continue to Reveal Mao’s Monstrosities

The communists slaughtered tens of millions in China through massacre, slavery and famine.

Jasper Becker, Ex-NPC Chief Admits Maoism Killed Millions
Vaclav Smil, China’s Great Famine: 40 Years Later [PDF]
Frank Dikötter, Mao’s Great Leap to Famine
Frank Dikötter, Mao’s Great Famine: The Grey Zone [PDF]

How the communists created the greatest man-made catastrophe in the history of the world.

Miriam and Ivan D. London, The Other China: The Three Red Flags of Death [PDF]
Miriam and Ivan D. London, The Other China: The Case of the Missing Beggars [PDF]
Miriam and Ivan D. London, Hunger in China: The “Norm of Truth” [PDF]
Miriam and Ivan D. London, Hunger in China: The Failure of a System? [PDF]

Forced starvation under communism.

Yongyi Song, The Cultural Revolution and the War Against Fascism [PDF]
Yongyi Song, The Dao County Massacre of 1967 [PDF]
Youqin Wang, Student Attacks Against Teachers: The Revolution of 1966
Youqin Wang, The Second Wave of Violent Persecution of Teachers: The Revolution of 1968

Mass murder during the Cultural Revolution.

Ex-Inmate Recalls Life in China’s Gulag [PDF]
“We Felt We Had Been Buried Alive”

“Class enemies” endured slavery and mass death in concentration camps.

Stephen W. Mosher, China’s One-Child Policy: Twenty-Five Years Later

Population control ideology and the resulting atrocities against tens of millions of women.

China: Human Rights Violations and Coercion in One-Child Policy Enforcement [PDF]
Chinese Region “Must Conduct 20,000 Abortions”

Forced abortions and infanticide under the totalitarian one-child policy.

MongoliaMass Buddhist Grave Reported in Mongolia

The communist slaughter in Mongolia.

North KoreaJack Rendler, The Last Worst Place on Earth: Human Rights in North Korea [PDF]

From Henry D. Sokolski, ed., Planning For a Peaceful Korea [PDF]. An excellent overview of this totalitarian slave state, where millions have been starved to death or murdered in concentration camps.

Jack Rendler, Horrific Conditions and Suffering Make It the Last Worst Place on Earth

A shorter and more recent account.

Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea [PDF]

The United Nations documents ongoing crimes against humanity in North Korea.

Fiona Terry, The Deadly Secrets of North Korea

Forced starvation has claimed millions of victims, primarily the elderly, the young and the sick.

David Hawk, The Hidden Gulag [PDF]
Death, Terror in N. Korea Gulag
North Korean Prison Guard Remembers Atrocities
7 Years of Torture in N. Korean Prison Camp
North Korean Imprisoned at Age 10 For Grandparents’ Dissent

Extensive evidence of torture and mass murder in the North Korean Gulag.

Regime That Kills Babies of Foreign Blood
“I Saw an Entire Family Being Killed”
Young Howard, The Hidden Gulag
Robert Park, The Case For Genocide in North Korea
North Korea’s Disappeared

Torture, medical experiments, infanticide and genocide in North Korea.

Robert Collins, Marked For Life: Songbun, North Korea’s Social Classification System [PDF]

The system of class apartheid in North Korea.

Vietnam– Pre-1975Lam Thanh Liem, Ho Chi Minh’s Land Reform: Mistake or Crime?
50 Years On, Vietnamese Remember Land Reform Terror

The bloodbath inflicted during the North Vietnamese land reform was effectively whitewashed by far-left activists in the West, but the victims were not so quick to forget.

The Blood-Red Hands of Ho Chi Minh

Stomach-churning accounts of communist mass murder during the Vietnam War.

The Massacre of Hue

In this communist massacre, thousands of men, women and children were slaughtered.

Stephen T. Hosmer, Viet Cong Repression and its Implications For the Future [PDF]

Detailed analysis of Viet Cong mass murder campaigns.

The Human Cost of Communism in Vietnam [PDF]

Compilation of research and newspaper reports on communist terror in Vietnam.

– Post-1975Le Thi Anh, Let the Vietnamese Speak For Themselves [PDF]
M. Stanton Evans, Westerners Ignore Vietnam Gulag [PDF]
Ginetta Sagan, Vietnam’s Postwar Hell [PDF]

Concentration camps and mass murder in post-1975 Vietnam.

Declaration of Disinherited Vietnamese on Human Rights [PDF]
Testament of Patriotic Prisoners in Vietnam [PDF]

Victims of state terror beg the outside world for help.

Nguyen Cong Hoan, Human Rights in Vietnam I [PDF] II [PDF]
Nguyen Cong Hoan, Why I Escaped From Vietnam

Defector’s account of totalitarian slavery in post-1975 Vietnam.

Doan Van Toai, In Vietnam’s Gulag, the Captives Die a Slow Death [PDF]

Survivor’s account of the hidden mass killings of political prisoners in the Vietnamese Gulag.

Theodore Jacqueney, They Are Us, Were We Vietnamese [PDF]
Ginetta Sagan and Stephen Denney, Re-education in Unliberated Vietnam: Loneliness, Suffering and Death
Stephen J. Morris, Glasnost and the Gulag: The Numbers Game [PDF]
Anh Do and Hieu Tran Phan, Camp Z30-D: The Survivors

Starvation, torture and murder in the Vietnamese Gulag.

Hanoi Regime Reported Resolved to Oust Nearly All Ethnic Chinese [PDF]
Vietnam Refugees Fleeced of Possessions, Expelled [PDF]
Escape From Vietnam: Nightmare at Sea Haunts Refugee Who Survived [PDF]
Vietnam Goes on Trial in Geneva Over Its Refugees [PDF]

Communist ethnic cleansing literally drove the Chinese population into the sea, where hundreds of thousands of boat people suffered and drowned.

Stephen Denney, Human Rights and Daily Life in Vietnam

Ongoing political persecution and class discrimination.

Laos40,000 Reported Held in Harsh Laos Camps [PDF]

Tens of thousands of political prisoners were sent to die in concentration camps.

The End of the Hmong
Lao Human Rights Council, White Paper on Genocide in Laos

The Vietnamese and Laotian communists waged a genocidal war against Hmong tribespeople.

Cambodia– Civil WarThe Agony of Phnom Penh [PDF]
Khmer Rouge’s Bloody War on Trapped Villagers [PDF]
“I Watched Them Saw Him 3 Days” [PDF]
Priest Won’t Leave Refugees Despite Khmer Rouge Threat [PDF]

The savagery of the Khmer Rouge was easily discoverable before 1975.

President Ford, News Conference on Cambodia [PDF]

President Ford warns of “an unbelievable horror story” if the communists capture Cambodia.

Fear of Cambodian Bloodbath Seen Key to Senate Vote on Aid [PDF]

More bloodbath predictions; anti-war leftists in Congress successfully cut off the aid shortly afterwards.

John D. Lofton, On Genocide in Cambodia

The refusal of the aid opponents to take responsibility for the expected consequences of their actions.

– Killing FieldsYin Savannary, Diary From Darkness [PDF]
Asian Blood Bath [PDF]
Cambodia: Work Hard or Die
Cambodia – An Outlaw Nation [PDF]

Early reports from survivors and journalists.

Leo Cherne, The Terror in Cambodia [PDF]
Leo Cherne, Cambodia – Auschwitz of Asia [PDF]

The chairman of the International Rescue Committee describes the mass murders.

Craig Etcheson, The Number: Quantifying Crimes Against Humanity in Cambodia
Bruce Sharp, Counting Hell

Studies demonstrating that the death toll was in the millions.

Lek Hor Tan, The Khmer Rouge: Beyond 1984? [PDF]
Henri Locard, State Violence in Democratic Kampuchea (1975-1979) and Retribution (1979-2004) [PDF]

Some excellent summaries of the Khmer Rouge bloodbath.

Hurst Hannum, International Law and Cambodian Genocide: The Sounds of Silence
Solomon Bashi, Prosecuting Starvation at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia [PDF]

Criminal responsibility for mass murder and forced starvation under the Khmer Rouge.

Cambodia Steps Slowly Toward a Genocide Trial
A Search For Justice by the Women Forced to Marry Strangers

Mass rape and other crimes against humanity under the Khmer Rouge.

Gender-Based Violence Under the Khmer Rouge

Extensive documentation of communist atrocities against women.

AfricaPeter Niggli, Ethiopian Resettlement: Vomit and Death [PDF]
Aid Unit Disputes Ethiopia’s Policy
Dawit Wolde Giorgis, Power and Famine in Ethiopia [PDF]
Michael Johns, Gorbachev’s Holocaust
Ethiopian Ex-Rulers Go on Trial
Ethiopian Dictator Sentenced to Prison

The communists caused a million deaths through terror and forced starvation in Ethiopia.

Cubans Wipe Out 70,000 in Angola Terror [PDF]
Nicholas Rowe, The Village of the Living Dead
John Hart, Cuban Atrocities in Angola

Mass murder by Cuban military forces in Angola.

John Matthew, Doubts on Angola Vote-Counting
National Society for Human Rights, Ending the Angolan Conflict [PDF]
National Society for Human Rights, Criminal Liability in Angola [PDF]
Global Witness, A Crude Awakening [PDF]
As Guerrilla War Ends, Corruption Now Bleeds Angola to Death

The MPLA regime’s responsibility for civil war and mass starvation in Angola.

Terror of Maputo Jail

Torture, rape, slavery and starvation in Mozambique’s Gulag.

Frelimo Victories, But One Million Starve [PDF]

The Frelimo regime’s contribution to mass starvation in Mozambique.

John Sweeney, Inside the Terror-Camp

The genocidal massacre of tens of thousands in Zimbabwe.

CubaMary Anastasia O’Grady, Counting Castro’s Victims [PDF]
Cuba’s Lost Population
Maria C. Werlau, Bloody Tally of a Fifty-Year Long Dictatorship
Maria C. Werlau, Most Deaths Largely Ignored [PDF]

Mass killings under communism in Cuba.

Deaths in Prison [PDF]
Victims of Che Guevara [PDF]
Executions by Raul Castro [PDF]

Shooting dissidents, murdering pregnant women, drowning children, etc.

The Cuban Rafter Phenomenon
Mary Anastasia O’Grady, The Lives of Cubans

The communists also murder boat people as they try to escape.

Elena Mederos, Human Rights and Cuban Law [PDF]
Alfred G. Cuzan, Castro’s “Revolutionary” Despotism [PDF]

The enslavement of the Cuban people.

Armando Valladares, Torture in Castro’s Cuba
Armando Valladares, Castro’s Gulag
From the Prisons of Cuba: A Cry For Help [PDF]
Frank Calzon, Jehovah’s Witnesses in Cuba [PDF]
Tribunal on Cuba, Castro’s Tropical Gulag [PDF]
Chronicle of an Unforgettable Agony: Cuba’s Political Prisons
Cuba’s Abuses of Psychiatry

The realities of political imprisonment and torture in Cuba.

NicaraguaNicaragua Executions Put at 500-1,000 [PDF]

Mass executions started within weeks of the Sandinista takeover.

Jose Esteban Gonzalez, Remember Nicaragua [PDF]

Nicaragua’s leading human rights activist on Sandinista persecution and terror.

Inside the Sandinista Regime: A Special Investigator’s Perspective [PDF]
Defector Describes “Bloody,” “Corrupt” Regime [PDF]

A former high-ranking official explains how the Sandinistas murdered thousands.

Inside Communist Nicaragua: The Miguel Bolanos Transcripts
Alfred G. Cuzan, Sandinista Goals Were Evident Long Ago [PDF]
Alfred G. Cuzan, The Nicaraguan Revolution: From Autocracy to Totalitarian Dictatorship? [PDF]
John Norton Moore, The Secret War in Central America and the Future of World Order [PDF]

Comprehensive record of the Sandinista role in provoking violence and war throughout the region.

J. Michael Waller, Tropical Chekists: The Sandinista Secret Police Legacy in Nicaragua

How the Sandinistas tried to build a police state through torture and murder.

PeruPeru Indians Take Up Arms Against Rebel Terror

Mass murder and enslavement of the poor by the Shining Path terrorists in Peru.

Other– Campaigns For EugenicsJonathan Freedland, Master Race of the Left

“Nearly every one of the left’s most cherished, iconic figures espoused views which today’s progressives would find repulsive… Indeed, contempt for ordinary people and outright racism were two of the defining creeds of British socialism.”

– Collaboration With FascistsOliver Kamm, The Far Left Meets the Far Right: A Historical Note

Japanese communist support for genocidal racist expansionism.

Nazi-Soviet Relations 1939-1941

Soviet-Nazi collaboration was the immediate cause of World War II.

E. Germany Ran Antisemitic Campaign in West in ’60s
Stasi Supported West German Neo-Nazi Groups

East German sponsorship of the neo-Nazi movement in West Germany.

– Collaboration With JihadistsPaul Bogdanor, Leftists For a Second Holocaust

How the far left embraced fanatics who advocate the mass murder of Jews.

Steven Stalinsky, Islamist-Left Alliance A Growing Force
John Perazzo, Platforms of the Enemy

The extreme left’s open collaboration with the most virulent hatemongers in the Middle East.

– The Post-9/11 LeftBrink Lindsey, Terrorism’s Fellow Travelers [PDF]

How extreme leftists blamed the victims and excused the perpetrators of the 9/11 massacres.

Edward Alexander, Professors For Suicide Bombers
Edward Alexander, Ward Churchill and the Politics of Campus Extremism

The murderous fanaticism of the campus far left.

Labour Party Supporter Anti-fascist Having Brain Stored For Future Cyborg

Daily Bale

Left-wing politically correct anti-fascist is paying to have her Brain stored in fluid so that she can come back in the future as a Politically Correct Robot !

Prototype 114 Politically Correct Robot

Prototype 114 Politically Correct Robot

Imagined image of the future politically correct Robotic left-wing sicko

You just could not make this up !

A Left-wing anti-fascist politically correct fruitcake and all round weirdo is to have her brain preserved in fluid so that in the future it can be transplanted into an anti-fascist Robot and she can continue to spread hatred and division amongst future generations with politically correct garbage.

Sharon Caslon, 26, an alleged member of the UAF anti-fascist organisation and an alleged Labour Party supporter is determined to have her brain preserved in solution after her death.

She wants to have it transplanted into a future politically correct left-wing UAF Cyborg and continue where she left off here to spread her message of Marxist hatred and name calling, by labelling future generations and offspring of present day right-wing respectable Nationalists and Patriots as ‘Fascists’ and ‘Racists’

Unite Against Fascism

Left-wing politically correct fruitcake Caslon is paying for the storage of her brain by saving all her benefit money throughout her lifetime and then hopefully living long enough to be able to pay for the storage of her twisted left-wing politically correct brain with the taxpayers money she has managed to save by the time of her death.

Caslon says she has no intention of working for what she sees as a Capitalist State and that all that matters to her is political correctness and left-wing Communist Marxism.

Caslon to have her Brain stored to be transplanted into a future Left-wing Cyborg

Caslon to have her Brain stored to be transplanted into a future Left-wing Cyborg

Scientists do actually believe that Caslon may be on to something, albeit with taxpayers money, but it may be possible in the future for human brains to survive death in robotic bodies. but would we want to ? especially alongside left-wing politically correct Cyborg weirdos and sickos.

We have had enough of the left-wing sick twisted politically correct fruitcakes, weirdos and sickos in our own time zone, would we really want to have left-wing anti-fascist politically correct Cyborgs running around like they do now shouting about the rights of foreign criminals and rapists, or smashing and defacing war memorials as they do now?

No we don’t think so, we do not want them now in our society, and we are less likely to want them then in the future, causing untold misery and racial division amongst our offspring.

The Scientific possibilities of transplanting a left-wing sickos brain into a Marxist leftist Cyborg

Three renowned scientists discussed whether it’s possible to remove a human brain from a body, even a left-wing twisted warped one we ask ? and put it in a tank, and give it a robotic body.

This wasn’t some bizarre late-night bar discussion: The conversation was a serious talk conducted on stage at a conference at New York’s Lincoln Center.

The University of Southern California’s Theodore Berger, Duke University’s Mikhail Lebedev, and Alexander Kaplan of Moscow University, all believe it’s possible for the brain to survive body-death inside a cybernetic shell.

In their panel at the Global Future 2045 conference, the trio discussed a future that sounds like a combination of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, the recent mouse inception, and Krang, the brain-in-a-box villain of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.

The talk, which took place in a mixture of Russian and English, focused on making it possible in our lifetime to conduct brain transplants, harvesting human parts from the body for cybernetic integration, and making self-aware brains comfortable in their new robot homes. It was just another Saturday afternoon, in other words.

Notably absent from the conversation was what the quality of life would be for human brains harvested into robotic bodies.

Although all three researchers come from impeccable neurology backgrounds, the talk centered on mostly whether it would be possible to make the technology work.

Whether it would be wise, or what the experience would be like for both patients and loved ones, wasn’t discussed as much.

The three researchers believe brain transplants are possible because the human brain is the last organ in the body to cease function after death.
Because the death process includes a short window where the brain functions without support from other organs, Berger, Kaplan, and Lebedev all believe there is precedent to have the human brain functioning indefinitely in a non-human carrier—as long as the appropriate support system is there for the brain.
They also stress the fact that nerve cells age slowly compared to other organs.

This brain-in-a-robot would be supported by biological blood substitutes (with “the necessary hormonal-biochemical and energetic substrate”) multi-channel brain-computer interfaces with two-way information exchange, neural prostheses, artificially re-grown human organs, and other biotech tools that we can’t even imagine.

Because there is no precedent for the human brain surviving and functioning outside of a human body, degrees of consciousness, intelligence, comprehension, and a million other existential quandaries that would or wouldn’t exist in a robo-brain simply aren’t evaluated.

The data points aren’t there for us to understand, even if it’s possible to transplant a human brain into a robot, what it’s like to be a human brain transplanted into a robot, even a sick twisted politically correct left-wing brain.

There are even interim holding facilities where living human brains could hypothetically be stored before transplantation.

While their roundtable discussion admittedly sounded like a master’s exercise in strange science, the kicker is that all three are engaged in preliminary efforts to make this happen.
Last year, at the resolutely mainstream MIT Media Lab,
Dr. Berger spoke about hacking the memories of rats.
Berger’s lab at USC is actively working on prosthetic brain implants that both falsify memories and stimulate brain function in damaged neurons.
The lab’s work recently received media attention when it successfully generated new memories in a rat that had its hippocampus chemically disabled.
In literature, Berger emphasizes his technology’s potential for treating Alzheimer’s and dementia through the possibility of “building spare parts for the brain;” on-stage in New York, he said it could also lead in the future to full-on brain transplants.

This would work in tandem with Kaplan’s and Lebedev’s specialties.

The two Russian scientists research brain-computer interfaces (BCIs)—plug-in interfaces which meld the human brain and nervous system to computer operating systems.

While BCIs are most commonly found in toys that read brainwaves to detect stress or concentration, they have revolutionary potential to change the lives of stroke victims and the disabled.

When combined, brain prosthetics and brain-computer interfaces could lead to brain transplants decades from now.

Would you want to spend decades or even a century living inside a robotic body at the mercy of a software interface to navigate the world or listening to even more left-wing garbage from politically correct anti-fascist Cyborgs ?

We’re just beginning to grasp the ethical, philosophical, and scientific implications. But with the right amount of funding, research, and cooperation, it’s entirely possible.

Anti-fascist Left-wing Politically Correct Sicko in Animal Outrage

Daily Bale

Yet another shocking Left-wing politically correct outrage by a Left-wing anti-fascist sicko

THE ANTI-FASCIST WHO TRIED TO HAVE ORAL SEX WITH A COW

Shamed left wing politically correct computer geek and alleged anti-fascist Paul ‘lefty’ Lovell, 61, escaped jail for trying to have sex with a sheep after a cow turned him down.

Unite Against Fascism

Left-wing Lovell, believed to be a member of Hope Not Hate, the anti-fascist organisation in the U.K, stripped to his socks and shoes and tried to insert his manhood into a cow’s mouth in a field next to Tottenham’s new training ground.

When the animal ambled off, left-wing Lovell then turned his politically correct attention to a bemused ewe and tried to have sex with it from behind.

Jurors laughed out loud when they heard the detail of the case and were told to get over their giggling fits by Judge James Patrick at Wood Green Crown Court.

Daily Bale

You just couldn’t make it up, as far as the politically correct Lefties are concerned, anything goes.

Leftist Lovell was handed a four month custodial sentence suspended for 18 months.

‘This is a case which as far as I am concerned is unique,’ Judge Patrick told Lovell.

British Tree surgeon Lawrence Stephen, 23, was enjoying a picnic with his girlfriend underneath their favourite oak tree when they were startled by the sight of the married man frolicking with the animals.

‘The way he was walking around the field, I could tell that he felt like he was the only person in the field,’ Mr Lawrence said.

‘He seemed like he was very comfortable with what he was doing – as if it was normal.

‘He was trying to thrust his waist towards the cows and using his hands to get the cow’s mouth towards his crotch.

Daily Bale

Left-wing politically Correct ‘Lefty Lovell’ loved the Cow’s Muzzle

‘I can’t remember him forcing the cow – he wasn’t actually grabbing the cow, but he was trying what he could.’

But the cows wandered off into the next field, leaving lefty Lovell to walk over towards some sheep, clutching a can of Skol and a Sainsbury’s bag with his clothes in, the court heard.

The bag also contained an adult nappy.

‘The sheep don’t stand still, they turn to just walk away or move their head so he was unsuccessful a number of times after going towards the main flock of sheep,’ Mr Stephen said.

Daily Bale

Left-wing Lovell then turned his depraved Left-wing lust towards the sheep, no animal was safe

‘I don’t know what he was trying to do but it seems he was trying to get some sort of sexual act performed from sheep,’ he said.

‘I felt sick for what was happening, it sort of disturbed me, I felt worried about him, also it is not right to do that to animals you know?’

Looking visibly shaken, Mr Stephen’s girlfriend Natasha Brennan, 23, told the court that she was ‘horrified’ by the disturbing acts.

‘Well, it was quite bizarre.

‘I don’t think that was normal behaviour and I was concerned for his mental well being,’ she said.

Daily Bale

The Left-wing politically correct fondness for anything Un-human or unnatural

Prosecutors claim he was trying to get the sheep to perform oral sex on him and then attempted to insert his penis either into the animal’s anus or vagina.

Left-wing politically correct Lovell said he had been sleeping and the idea that he had thrust against sheep was ‘completely ridiculous’.

‘The only time that I saw the sheep was when I woke up… I was surrounded by sheep about 2 metres away, about 10-12 sheep, something like that,’ he said.

‘I don’t particularly like animals hanging around me when I am sleeping so I sat up and sort of clapped my hands a bit but they didn’t take much notice of that so I stood up briefly and stamped my feet on the ground and clapped my hands again,’ he said.

‘I can understand that somebody from a long distance away would have wondered what was happening when I was trying to chase the sheep away from my location.’

Police claimed when they arrived Lovell had his shorts down, but he insisted they were up at all times.

Prosecutor Richard Hutchinson insisted Lovell was ‘interested sexually’ in the farmyard animals.

‘Mr Stephen and Ms Brennan saw him attempt to make a penetrative motion, thrusting towards the rear of the sheep’s vagina or anus again and again.’

Lovell then lay down in the field and pulled his shorts up, the court heard.

The shocked and disgusted couple rang 999 and Lovell was found in the field near Archers Wood by the police and taken to Edmonton police station.

He told the police he was ‘just relaxing’.

Left-wing Lovell, of Enfield, was found guilty of outraging decency by trying to commit sexual acts with animals in public places by a jury at Wood Green Crown Court.

British Community Initiative and Spirit. British Communities United in Identity

Daily Bale

Daily Bale Community Initiative events

People often comment these days that local communities are becoming more fragmented by left wing politically correct bullying, intimidation, manipulation and the evil of leftist Anti-fascist Anti British treachery.

Also we hear more and more that –

‘society isn’t the same now as it was 50 or 100 years ago and that we have been corrupted and ruined by leftist perversion and politically correct sickness’

Also, that we don’t know our neighbours, and we don’t know our local shopkeepers.

We think those claims are very true, and we absolutely know who is to blame.

The Left-wing politically correct parasites and leftist lunatics.

But the Daily Bale Community Initiative  is taking a great step towards fixing all that.

The Daily Bale has always encouraged celebrations in communities to bring patriots together like the Queen’s Jubilee and the excitement of the London Olympic and Paralympic Games.

The Daily Bale is looking at establishing a series of community created events to take place in outdoor and indoor recreational space up and down the country – all organised by local people and helping to bring local communities together, no matter of faith or identity, apart from politically correct leftist lunatics, of course.

Daily Bale

The Daily Bale  is all about exposing the evil of left wing political correctness and the hypocrisy of the left wing Anti-British Anti-fascist criminals who pretend to be about equality, but who in actual fact just breed hatred and division.

Left-wing Politically Correct Anti-fascist Organisations Dividing Our Communities

Left-wing Politically Correct Anti-fascist Organisations Dividing Our Communities

The Daily Bale takes the lead and encourages the people of all communities to come together in National spirit and enjoy themselves outdoors and indoors to bring all communities together in true identity, without the concerns of being labeled or branded by the left wing as fascists or racists, or some other vile race hate disgusting terminology that these sick Marxist leftist parasites use to divide communities and cause hatred and misery and the further segregation of British communities with their vile leftist hatred of anything or anybody who classifies themselves as British or part of the British community as a whole.

Daily Bale

All over the country there are dog shows, car races, bike races, sports tasters, boxing clubs, woodland walks, youth clubs, hiking clubs, dance clubs – anything and everything. The Daily Bale will be only too happy to provide our logo and our support in the name of decency and community togetherness.

In Somerset in July last year, around 1,000 people from the local community came together to celebrate their own community togetherness  with lots of live music and entertainment.

Daily Bale
There were free bouncy castles and sumo wrestling outfits, and when they were hungry a free barbecue was provided – all funded by local community groups and businesses.

At Gillespie Park in Islington last September, the Friends of Gillespie Park had over 2,000 people attend their community event and many local organisations were delighted to be involved.

Students with learning disabilities ran an organic café, Arsenal Football Club came and set up a football game and the local fire service brought along a fire engine for the kids to explore.

The Daily Bale did not run any of these events, but it goes to show you that all of the community events that took place were a great way of getting people active and outdoors in unity and identity as a community.

What’s more, with future Daily Bale Community initiative associated events, organisers would feel it helps them to build new relationships with local people and bring the whole community together without the evil vile left wing politically correct interference or Anti British negativity from Marxists and degenerate leftist Anti-fascist parasites.

If you are interested about getting your community together in true pride and togetherness, then get a local event contact page or event organiser going, and ask everybody how they can provide and bring to your community event.

The left wing Anti-fascists will try to stop the event and will probably call your organisers and helpers all kinds of vile disgusting race hate and fascist racist names, but in these circumstances it is essential that you inform your local community about who is doing this, what they are doing, and always notify the Police.

This is the very reason that community events work, because they bring all people together, and they show a community united spirit, and expose the true evil of the left wing Anti-fascist anti-British criminals.

People often say that communities “aren’t what they used to be” but if you get involved with a Daily Bale Community Initiative  event then you might just be surprised at how many people from all identities within the community want to get involved and just how much the Great is still in the Britain.

The Daily Bale Community Initiative- bringing communities together in true unity and spirit.

Laugh at the Left-wing Campaign. Daily Bale Launches ‘Laugh at a Leftie’

Daily Bale

Daily Bale launches ‘Laugh at a Leftie’ campaign to bring some humour to the ridiculous nature of Left-wing political correctness that we have all had to endure for so long, but now thankfully we have a Conservative majority Government in power and a return to common sense hopefully.

Labour is facing at least three decades in the wilderness, party warned.

Leftie fruitcakes thought that the people actually supported them or worst still wanted a Labour leftist Government in power !

Tony Blair, John Prescott and Lord Mandelson lead criticism of Ed Miliband’s failed strategy, as concern grows for the future of the Labour party that nobody wants, likes, or even votes for anymore never mind ever wants in Government ever again

Anti-fascist-HOPE-not-hate-UAF

Left wing politically correct weirdos and sickos have been shouting and blubbing about how unfair it is towards their politically correct twisted warped feelings that nobody supports left wing sick policies, and the left wing Marxists along with the dangerous Anti-fascist violent organisations have been protesting and defacing war memorials again in London after the Election last week because they did not like it that they are a small minority of weirdos, sickos, and cranks that nobody listens to or even takes seriously at all or in any way.

Hope not hate. Anti Fascist.

The Daily Bale says – we must now start to petition strongly to have these violent evil left wing Anti British so called Anti-fascist groups banned and outlawed as criminal unlawful groups.

The so called Anti-fascist groups use violence, intimidation, threats and fear or manipulation to try to make the Public bend to their way of seeing things, and anybody who opposes them or questions them are met with a barrage of threats and evil vile race hate name calling like ‘Racist’ or ‘Fascist’

The British Public Must Be Protected From These Criminals.

They also use Social Media and set up anonymous accounts to try and bully and intimidate Social Network users who follow legitimate political Parties like Ukip and other respectable groups.

HOPE not hate

Left wing politically correct looney tune fruit the loop ding dong cuckoo cranks 

Labour has been plunged deeper into crisis as some of the party’s most senior figures warned that they would be out of power until at least 2025 or even 2035/45 by other opinions.

As the search began for a new leader, former Cabinet ministers joined members of Ed Miliband’s front-bench team to call on the party to “skip a generation” and pick a candidate who is untainted by the failures of the past, and also people want all the garbage of left wing politically correct nonsense gone.

Tony Blair, John Prescott and Lord Mandelson entered the debate with withering assessments of the current state of the party.

The former Prime Minister called for Labour to reclaim the political centre ground. He said the party had to show it stood for for “ambition and aspiration” as well as compassion and care”, making clear a change of direction was needed if the party was to regain power.

Mr Blair defended Mr Miliband’s “courage under savage attack”, but Lord Mandelson gave a brutal assessment of his leadership, describing his attack on “predatory” capitalists as “completely useless” as he said the decision to abandon New Labour was a “terrible mistake”.

Dan Hodges: Labour forgot the golden rules of politics

The Labour peer said the party is facing its worst challenge since the 1980s, when it spent 18 years out of power: “We were sent out and told to say we’re for the poor and hate the rich, ignoring the vast swathe of the population who exist in between.”

Speaking on the Andrew Marr show on BBC One, he described Mr Miliband’s campaign as a “giant political experiment” which had ended in the public “ripping stripes off our shoulders”.

Mr Prescott also unleashed a blistering attack on the Labour campaign, pouring scorn on Mr Miliband’s “Hell yes, I’m tough” claim and accusing him of failing to defend the previous Labour government’s record on the economy.

Tony Blair: Labour must reclaim centre
Lord Mandelson delivers excorating verdict on Miliband

John Prescott launches bilstering attack on failed campaign

In its worst election night for 30 years, Labour finished with just 232 MPs – 99 behind the Conservatives and 26 fewer seats than Gordon Brown won in 2010.

Blame quickly fell on a series of strategic blunders, including “gimmicks” such as Mr Miliband’s courtship of Russell Brand, the comedian, and his decision to engrave his manifesto pledges into an 8ft slab of limestone.

Ed Miliband appears on camera with Communist Marxist Russell Brand

Mr Miliband’s own standing as leader was also seen as “a personal drag” on the party’s prospects which candidates had to overcome on the doorstep, shadow cabinet ministers said.

But in a display of public recriminations, some of the party’s most prominent MPs clashed openly over whether Labour’s “old-school, socialist” anti-business agenda had put voters off – or whether the party had not been Left-wing enough to win.

One shadow cabinet minister said the pledge stone – which became ridiculed as the “Edstone” – was “a disastrous gimmick” that cost the party credibility.

In truth, however, the Labour leadership had known for months that winning a majority was going to be all but impossible.

Since the turn of the year, when all the major parties moved to an election footing, some of Mr Miliband’s closest advisers have been planning to rule as a minority government. Yet even this limited ambition came to nothing.

David Cameron’s new Cabinet
Dan Hodges: The fight is on for the soul of the Labour Party

On Saturday Ben Bradshaw, Labour’s Blairite former culture secretary, pleaded with his party not to lurch even further to the Left when choosing a new leader and a fresh strategy.

“Please, colleagues in the Labour movement and outside commentators, don’t try to claim we lost because Labour wasn’t radical, Left-wing or distinctive enough,” he said after retaining his seat in Exeter.

“Ed and his team bet on the British people moving to the Left in response to the global financial crisis. The whole of our strategy was based on this. But it was not true.”

http://renderer.qmerce.com/interaction/554dda81103be6e0709e573d

In a damning critique of Mr Miliband’s anti-business agenda, he called for Labour to choose a leader who will “celebrate our entrepreneurs and wealth creators and not leave the impression they are part of the problem”.

Mr Bradshaw’s lament was echoed by members of Mr Miliband’s inner circle, as the profound disappointment at the results exposed deep divisions within what had previously been a united team.

Liam Byrne admits being ‘burnt with shame’ at ‘no money’ letter

One shadow cabinet minister said: “We failed to connect with aspirational voters who want to know how we are going to make their lives better. We must speak to the whole of Britain, not just sections of Britain. There was too much fear and not enough hope.”

Diane Abbott, one of Labour’s most strangest MPs, disagreed and urged her party to adopt an even more radical, pro-immigration agenda. She wrote on Twitter: “Alarming that myth is taking hold that Ed Miliband lost because he was too ‘Left wing’.  We have news for you Diane, he was too left wing, and so are you !

Blairites, however, warned that the party must return to the centre ground.

Some people we spoke to just want the Party gone altogether.

Lord Hutton of Furness, a former business secretary, said Labour should choose a leader from a new generation.

“We’re back to where we were 30 years ago. Few of us after the Nineties success [under Tony Blair] thought we’d ever be in this position again. There’s a limited appetite for the old-school socialist menu which we had on offer,” he said.

Alan Johnson, a former home secretary, said: “This is a 10-year task. This is a job for the future.” He said the party had lost the ability to appeal to people’s “aspirations”, which Mr Blair had done in 1997. “That was one of the big successes that won us three elections.”

As Mr Miliband – who resigned – and his advisers sought to console themselves in private, attention turned to who could take over and lead a party ravaged by a second devastating defeat.

• Ed Miliband ‘sorry’ as he resigns as Labour leader

Within hours of the result being announced, as many as 10 senior MPs began testing support at Westminster for potential leadership bids. Others were contemplating running for deputy leader after Harriet Harman announced she would also stand down.

Andy Burnham, the shadow health secretary, and Yvette Cooper, the shadow home secretary, quickly emerged as favourites to stand for leader, with both keeping a notably low profile as they considered their options.

But the two front-runners are both New Labour figures who served in the governments of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, and both have been key figures during Mr Miliband’s doomed election campaign.

Chuka Umunna, the shadow business secretary, is seen as the leading “modernising” candidate and, at 36, would be young enough to build support in opposition and gain experience while appealing to a new generation.

However, speaking on condition of anonymity, some of Labour’s leading figures – whose endorsement will be fervently courted by the candidates – warned that none of the contenders seemed capable of steering the party back to power.

They complained that Miss Cooper is “too technocratic” and does not seem to embody the right “values”, while Mr Burnham would be too Left-wing and vulnerable to claims that he was a puppet of the unions.

One member of Labour’s front-bench team said the party was bracing itself for being out of office until at least 2025. “We have a massive task. We are 100 seats behind. This is a 10-year job,” the source said.

“Anybody involved in the Blair-Brown wars cannot be chosen, but I don’t think anybody else has emerged yet,” the figure said. Another leading Labour figure, and former minister, said the next leader must be a “moderniser”, which would rule out both front-runners.

Mr Burnham “is not a modernising candidate at all. Ed believed in things and he was prepared to stand by them, like Europe, whereas Andy is a Left-wing populist,” the source said. “Yvette? I think her moment has past. She is too much the Blair-Brown

On Saturday night there were growing calls for Labour to turn to a younger generation of so-called “clean skins” who did not serve in the New Labour governments, with Mr Umunna, the shadow business secretary the clear favourite.

Other fresh faces believed to be plotting their campaigns include Tristram Hunt, the education spokesman and a television historian, Liz Kendall, a health and care spokesman, and Dan Jarvis, a former soldier.

Stella Creasy, who has fought popular campaigns against payday lenders, and Mary Creagh, the shadow international development secretary, are also being urged to run.

One Labour MP, who was close to the Miliband leadership, dismissed them all: “None of them is very convincing.”

Key events in the 2015 General Election campaign
March 30
David Cameron our Prime Minister and the British People now rejoice in victory.
David Cameron informs the Queen of the dissolution of Parliament and fires the starting gun of the election. Returning to No 10, he says: “Together we are turning our country around and for the sake of you, your family, and your children’s future, we have got to see this through.”
April 1
More than 100 of the country’s most senior business figures warn that a Labour government would “threaten jobs and deter investment” in the UK. In a letter to The Telegraph, they praise Conservative economic policies and warn that a “change in course” would “put the recovery at risk”.
April 2
Ed Miliband, the Labour leader, fails to break through in the first election debate since the dissolution of Parliament, with minority parties emerging as the winners of the contest. Mr Cameron finishes the debate as voters’ overwhelming choice to lead the country, according to a snap poll. The Prime Minister urges voters not to send the UK back to “square one” by electing Mr Miliband.
April 4
A leaked memo seen by the Telegraph claims that Nicola Sturgeon, privately said she would “rather see” Mr Cameron win the general election because Mr Miliband is not “prime minister material”. The official account of a discussion between the SNP leader and the French ambassador appears to confirm that her party would privately favour another Tory-led government because it might help to stoke up anti-English sentiment. Both the French ambassador and Ms Sturgeon deny she made the comment.
April 7
Mr Miliband announces that Labour will scrap the non-dom tax status enjoyed by those who are British citizens but do not pay tax on earnings made outside the UK. He claims that the 200-year-old scheme costs hundreds of millions of pounds a year and has made Britain “an offshore tax haven for a few”. Duncan Bannatyne, the entrepreneur and Dragons’ Den star, above, says the policy “gets my vote”, having previously backed the Tories’ economic plans.
April 8
One of the most memorable images of the election campaign emerges when Mr Cameron visits the Sacred Heart Roman Catholic Primary School in Westhoughton, Bolton. Six-year-old Lucy Haworth, sitting next to the Prime Minister, becomes overcome with shyness when he asks if she will read aloud from a book. “Why don’t I do a line and you do a line, is that fair?” he asks, prompting her to rest her face on the desk.
April 13
Mr Miliband publishes Labour’s election manifesto, which focuses on economic competence. Measures include a £2.5?billion NHS Time to Care fund in the early years of the next parliament, 25 hours of free childcare for working parents of three and four-year-olds, and smaller class sizes for five, six, and seven-year-olds.
April 14
The Conservatives launch their manifesto. It includes a pledge that working families with three or four-year-old children will get 30 hours of free childcare a week. The manifesto also includes plans to revive Margaret Thatcher’s right-to-buy policy to enable 1.3?million families in housing association properties to own their home.
April 16
Nicola Sturgeon delivers a strong performance in a live BBC debate in which she sets out the terms of a deal to work with Ed Miliband and “lock David Cameron out of Downing Street”. Pledging to “make Labour bolder”, the SNP leader dominates the debate.
April 21
Sir John Major, the former Conservative prime minister, suggests the party’s campaign lacks passion. At a question-and-answer session with Tory activists he says: “Behind this sloganising of economics, about growth and matters like that [are] lives, people that really matter. We should focus on people, people, people.”
April 25
David Cameron accidentally jokes that he wishes everyone supported West Ham — a Premier League rival of the team he is meant to back, Aston Villa.
April 27
The Prime Minister makes a speech aimed at rejecting claims that his campaign has lacked energy and passion. Mr Cameron says that he is “pumped up” and has more desire to win this election than he did in 2010. “If I’m getting lively about it, it’s because I feel bloody lively about it,” he said.
April 29
Russell Brand releases an interview with Ed Miliband in which the Labour leader says he wants to confront “the richest and most powerful” in Britain. The video, filmed for the comedian’s YouTube channel, is uploaded after Mr Miliband was pictured leaving Brand’s home at night. Brand praises Mr Miliband for “understanding how the country feels”.
April 30
Mr Miliband, David Cameron and Nick Clegg appear separately in a BBC Question Time Leaders’ special during which the Labour leader is lambasted by a business owner over his party’s record on the economy. Catherine Shuttleworth, 48, from Leeds, says Ed Miliband should fire Ed Balls, after the shadow chancellor claimed that a note stating there is “no money left” was nothing more than a joke. Mr Miliband is widely mocked on social media when he trips in the studio.
May 3
Ed Miliband is accused of suffering his “Neil Kinnock moment” after pledging to install an eight-foot limestone monument to his manifesto in the Downing Street garden. Critics dub it a “policy cenotaph” and “the heaviest suicide note in history”. In an embarrassing gaffe, Lucy Powell, Labour’s campaign vice-chairman, later suggests Mr Miliband could still break the pledges.
May 7
A bombshell exit poll released as voting finishes at 10pm suggests David Cameron is on course to sweep back into Downing Street with 316 seats — a far greater number than his party expected. Labour insist the results are likely to be wrong: they show a very different picture from the party’s private polling. However, over the next 12 hours it will become clear that the Conservatives have gained more seats than even the poll suggested.
May 8
David Cameron announces he is forming the first Conservative majority government for 23 years, after winning 329 seats by early afternoon yesterday. Nigel Farage, left, Nick Clegg and Ed Miliband resign as leaders of their parties within the space of around an hour. Mr Clegg describes the result as “the most crushing blow to the Liberal Democrats since our party was founded”.

Feminist Left Wing Politically Correct Fruitcakes Even Hate Women Now

Daily Bale

The ‘self-described feminists’ who have contributed to Freedom Fallacy do not like women. They can’t stand Beyonce, Madonna or Miley Cyrus. They hate Fifty Shades of Grey author, EL James.

Women who become ‘mail-order brides’, work in the sex industry, have cosmetic surgery or read glossy fashion magazines are reviled if powerful, written off as irrevocably afflicted with ‘internalised misogyny’ if unrepentant, or pitied as victims if they have expressed any regrets.

They reserve a special loathing for women they describe as ‘third wave’, ‘popular’, ‘liberal’ or ‘choice’ feminists.

Freedom Fallacy brings together some 20 writers and academics all intent on exposing ‘the limits of liberal feminism’. This new brand of feminism is apparently very popular because it champions ‘the fallacy that substantive equality has already been achieved and that the pursuit of opportunity lies solely in women’s hands’.

In contrast, this book sets out to tell women that, irrespective of what positions of power and responsibility they might be in, they are still oppressed. If women think that they are free to determine the course of their own lives, Freedom Fallacy is here to put them right.

The central argument of Freedom Fallacy is that so-called ‘choice’ or ‘liberal’ feminists propagate falsehoods about female autonomy while ignoring the structural inequalities that limit the freedom of women.

For example, choice feminists who argue that the (rapidly diminishing) gender pay gap is largely down to the choices people have made are criticised for overlooking the many material and psychological factors that reportedly hold women back in the workplace.

Likewise, feminists who suggest that women, as adults, might freely choose to go on a diet, have plastic surgery, or pose topless in exchange for money, are criticised for presenting oppression as something women freely enter into, rather than have inflicted upon them.

The liberal feminists are accused of recasting women’s liberation as an individual pursuit and therefore rendering it ineffective at bringing about real changes.

Freedom Fallacy contains a frustrating amount of hyperbole and lacks critical engagement with either data or counterarguments. We are told that there is ‘a dangerous, global epidemic of male entitlement’, that ‘the trafficking of women and girls [is a] booming global businesses’, and we are alerted to ‘the global pandemic that is violence against women and girls’.

But we are given no evidence to substantiate these claims and little historical or geographical context in order to evaluate them for ourselves.

The reality for most women in the Western world today is far removed from this bleak image: women are less likely to be victims of violent crime than men; domestic abuse is in decline; girls outnumber and outperform boys in education; and young women earn the same or even more than their male contemporaries.

Freedom Fallacy’s assertion that women are still victims of oppression hinges on a concept of ‘patriarchy’ which is evoked repeatedly throughout the book. We are told that when it comes to patriarchy, ‘we need to bear in mind that the main problem is men: men’s choices, men’s ways of seeing and treating women’.

Exploring the material conditions that shape women’s choices is entirely laudable; however, when it is done with minimal evidence and with a predetermined conclusion — women are victims of patriarchy — the focus shifts immediately from structural inequalities to the behaviour of men.

Despite all the evidence to suggest that wealthy, highly educated, Western women have more choices than ever, and more choices than working-class men, the authors of Freedom Fallacy are determined to present women as ‘kept down’.

They do this first by arguing that all women form a global ‘class’ with collective interests in common and then by extrapolating from the problems experienced by some women living in extremely impoverished countries to all women in the world.

So, when the authors make horrific claims about the trafficking and mutilation of girls, they then argue ‘these injustices exist on a continuum with other issues of inequality such as the sexual division of household labour’.

Drawing an equivalence in the experiences of women around the world masks the huge differences in the economic circumstances between people in different countries.

The authors of Freedom Fallacy, so critical of ‘choice’ feminists for ignoring the structural inequalities faced by women, ask no questions about the causes of global poverty and make no suggestions as to how poor countries can become more prosperous.

Instead, they complain about the behaviour of men. Changing the behaviour of men might mean, at best, that disadvantage is distributed a little more equally, but it will do little to lift whole nations out of the poverty that so restricts individual freedom and choice.

When faced with relatively few opportunities to make a better, more prosperous life for themselves and their families, some women choose to escape poverty through marriage, pornography or prostitution — options that make Western middle-class feminists squeamish.

Aware of the limited options available to them, women who choose sex work or ‘mail order’ marriage have decided that this is the best choice for them. Presenting these women as weak and vulnerable, as victims of male behaviour who have been deluded into thinking they were able to make a choice about their future, does them no favours whatsoever.

The authors of Freedom Fallacy draw parallels between women who choose a desperate route of poverty and wealthy Western women who, for example, opt for cosmetic surgery. They argue that both lack autonomy and the ability to consent freely to such decisions.

This denies the real political and economic gains many women around the world, but especially in the more prosperous West, have made. It attaches victim status to women who are in socially and financially powerful positions, while at the same time trivialising the very real problems experienced by women in developing countries and the lengths some go to to break out of poverty.

The contributors to Freedom Fallacy are critical of women who challenge the view that patriarchy creates ‘a dominant group (men) that holds systemic, individual power over an oppressed group (women)’. They either scorn or pity women who want ‘sexual harassment rebranded as harmless banter’ or argue that ‘objectification is the new empowerment’.

Unfortunately, this, like much of the analysis presented in Freedom Fallacy, seems to be at least a decade out of date. The description of a generation of sassy, confident women telling the world they are free to make their own choices stands in sad contrast to many of today’s young feminists, who seem all too ready to declare themselves vulnerable to everyday sexism, fat-shamed by adverts, the targets of rape-culture if they are catcalled in the street, or victims of lad culture if they are chatted up in the university bar.

Calls for censorship, trigger warnings and safe spaces seem to be far more the hallmark of modern-day feminism than women arguing sexual harassment is harmless banter. In such a climate, suggesting that women are oppressed, have little agency and are unable to make ‘authentic choices’ simply reinforces mainstream feminist thought.

The authors of Freedom Fallacy are right that the notion of personal freedom today is all too often trivialised as an ability to make spurious choices between different types of consumer goods. They are right that the power and freedom we have to make real choices over our destinies is all too limited.

They are also correct that ‘liberation cannot be found at a purely individual level’. To achieve this liberation we need to stop dividing people according to gender and pitching men against women. Freedom Fallacy argues that issues of gender should transcend politics, but this would leave us forever locked into our biology.

Instead we need politics today to transcend gender squabbles. Everyone benefits from having more control over their own lives, more freedom and more meaningful choices to make. We need to celebrate the power and agency we do have rather than desperately searching for arguments that will allow some of the most powerful people in the world to attach the label ‘victim’ to themselves.