Anti Fascist Left Wing Political Correctness in the U.K Exposed and Shamed


Left Wing Politically Correct Anti Fascist Communist Weirdos, Sickos And Perverts Exposed.

Everybody up and down the U.K are now talking and sharing their thoughts and feelings on the injustices and criminality of leftist political correctness and its evil ideology, its suppression of freedom of speech, its disgusting Anti British bullying, manipulation, intimidation and unjust immoral undemocratic fascist cowardly pathetic existence.

Left Wing Political Correctness and a short Study in Pure Evil.


The Labour-supporting blogger Sunny Hundal has done his bit for world peace by declaring that Right-wingers are all “evil”. Obviously, it’s political hyperbole at its most silly. But this kind of rhetoric is increasingly common among Left-wingers who think that conservatives who want to reform welfare, stop the NHS from killing people or make sure kids can leave school with the ability to tie their own shoe-laces are – to use Sunny’s words – “heartless bastards.”

So if we’re going to play this game of tit-for-tat, I’d like to offer evidence that it’s the Left that’s pure evil rather than the right. Aside from hating freedom and the baby Jesus, they also commit these five mortal sins without any thought for the rest of us:


1. Bad stand-up comedy. Call me old-fashioned, but I always thought a comedian was a fat man in a tux who came on stage and told jokes. But Left-wingers will laugh at something not because it’s funny but because they think they’re supposed to – which been an enormous boon to the careers of “alternative” comedians like Jeremy Hardy, Josie Long, Robin Ince, Mark Thomas and Marcus Brigstocke (seriously, folks, I’ve known colonoscopies that are funnier than Marcus Brigstocke). Their acts are basically George Galloway speeches with a laughter track added and one of their favourite targets are the “fascist simpletons” who believe in God. Oddly, though, they never pick on fundamentalist Muslims. They can’t seem to see the funny side of having a fatwa put on their head.


2. They all seem to be about 12 years old. My old nan used to complain that policemen were getting younger and younger, but the same now applies to Labour politicians. And for some reason it’s become a requirement that Left-wing pundits look like Blue Peter presenters – all opened-necked shirts, spiky hair and shiny, shiny faces. Would it surprise you if Sunny, Ellie, Owen or Laurie broke away from a debate on globalisation to tell the audience how to build a Thunderbird Tracy Island out of pipe cleaners and a plastic bottle?

1069249_486693894752063_1020417221_n (1)

3. They care about what famous people think about things. Barbara Windsor is a lifelong Conservative, but you wouldn’t know that because she doesn’t drop it into every conversation. On the other hand, we all know the politics of Ben Elton, Stephen Fry, Ross Kemp, Tony Robinson and Eddie Izzard because they never shut up about it. Eddie Izzard is even thinking of running for Mayor of London; if so, I hope the Tories go tit-for-tat and run the Chuckle Brothers against him. It’s a strange thing about the Left that while they claim to be egalitarian they go all weak at the knees when they discover that a rich famous person supports their cause. It can backfire – no one’s going to be inviting Alec Baldwin to their gay wedding.


4. They’re willing to give murderers the benefit of the doubt. There’s nothing more annoying than a Leftie in a Che Guevara t-shirt – a racist sociopath who helped to establish a regime that butchered all its opponents and threw into jail anyone who was “a bit camp”. But Left-wing sympathy for patently bad people is typical. One campaign that irritates me more than any other is the crusade to allow prisoners to vote, as if we want to give a democratic voice to convicted fraudsters and lunatics who think they have a mandate from God to kill their grandma and wear her scalp as a hat. If this stupid idea ever gains any ground, the only upshot would be that politicians might have to start canvasing in maximum-security prisons. Oh, how I’d dearly like to see Nick Clegg beg Ian Brady for his vote.


5. They think that people who don’t share their opinions are evil. But that Left-wingers are the most tolerant people on earth – until they encounter someone who disagrees with them. Disagreement offends their sense of righteousness, and turns champions of free speech and free love into 17th-century Puritans. The leftist politically correct monsters will bully, victimise and target anybody who threatens to expose their evil satanic Anti British self hating twisted sick perverted immoral false ideology.

If you don’t believe me, follow this simple exercise.

A) Post this article on your Facebook page.

B) Mention that you feel leftists are fascist and just as bad if not worse than the extreme right wing.

C) Suggest that we should all Unfriend these sicko immoral people immediately.

D) Just wait and see how many leftist Cockroaches come out of the shadows !

E) Then do the right thing – block them and report them for abuse and warn others about them.

Read on here – Share this article – Spread the word.

The Evil of Left Wing Political Correctness.


The Daily Bale again brings your attention to the ‘massive left wing scam’ that the left wing use against the people to gain control of your thoughts and your freedom of speech, by pretending to use ‘morality’ as their claim to righteousness and authenticity.

By using the perception of morality, and then terming it as ‘Political Correctness’ they then use that to shame, bully, intimidate and manipulate and force their own way, and their own left wing political agenda, by silencing any opposition or questioning of their point of view, by calling you a ‘racist’ or a ‘fascist’ if you so much as question these evil people.

They get away with it by keeping you continuously on the defensive. Think about it – if you are being labelled as a racist or a fascist, then your first reaction is to defend yourself, because the majority of people are appalled by those terms, and the social stigma attached to those labels. Are you beginning to get the picture now ?

But let us look more closely at the people throwing those disgusting terms and labels at everybody else, why they are doing it, and what does it really says about the people doing it.

The people doing it are almost always left wing and self righteous in attitude. They are doing it to shame, bully, intimidate and manipulate the other person or person’s into following the same twisted thought process, and they try to make the individual feel false shame and guilt so that the individual falls in quickly to the left wing politically correct agenda, whilst the politically correct weirdos themselves project a perceived ‘moral’ high ground and thus deceptively ‘prove’ themselves to be morally right.

The overall percentage of politically correct left wing weirdos have been shamed and brainwashed themselves by the same sick and evil ideology that they are now pushing themselves – they just dont realise that this is why they are doing it.

But, this is where the whole rotten disgusting false morality of Political Correctness falls flat on its face, and the ‘real’ racists and ‘fascists’ are exposed for the shameful and immoral evil people they really are.

Logic tells you very plainly, that you have to recognise ‘differences’ in people in the first place to then go on and accuse others of doing the very thing that you yourself ‘recognise’ which is ‘differences’ of race.

The majority of us do not see ‘differences’ and we just see other ‘people’ or other human beings just the same as every other human being on this planet. But the Politically Correct left wing racists actually pick up on ‘differences’ and then go on to accuse other people of what they themselves see, which is ‘differences’ in other people.


The politically correct racists and fascists then use the ‘differences’ that they see to then go on and falsely accuse others of racism, and thus shaming people into submission and keeping them quiet and preventing any questioning whatsoever as to the moral foundation of what they are doing or what they actually stand for – which in this case is the squashing of freedom of speech and politically correct fascist left wing domination of all areas of society by P.C bullying.

It thus becomes a dictatorial order of either – conform to our way of seeing things, or be branded a racist or a fascist.


Charles Manson Connection To Left Wing Anti Fascist Politically Correct Sickos


Evil killer Charles Manson may of had alleged connections with left wing politically correct Marxist sickos.


Could this be the ultimate face of left wing Politically Correct Marxist Anti Fascist evil ?

Chilling: This photograph of renowned serial killer Charles Manson has been released by Californian prison officials ahead of the killer's twelfth parole hearing on Wednesday

Charles Manson is an American cult leader whose followers carried out several notorious murders in the late 1960s and inspired the book Helter Skelter.

But was Charles Manson also deeply connected to a left wing politically correct Marxist Anti fascist movement ?


Many people over the years have speculated that Charles Manson was much more involved with the extreme side of left wing politics than his desire for right wing leanings.

But could Charles Manson now be classified as a white middle class hating left wing Anti Fascist Marxist and Communist ?

Many people say these days that – “yes he can be classified as just that, and even more so on the same level of thinking as Lee Harvey Oswald who was a known left wing freak”

Oswald being shot dead by Jack Ruby for killing J.F.K
Lee Harvey Oswald, alleged killer of president John F Kennedy, shot dead by Jack Ruby in Dallas on this day in 1963. Picture: AP

Charles Manson was well known to use the word ‘Comrade’ when dealing with followers, and had been known to term the rich people in society as ‘Capitalist Filth’


The question that must remain on everyone’s minds is –

“just how far did Charles Manson’s associations go around and within sick twisted left wing politically correct Marxist thinking, and do we have a clear insight here to the real mentality of today’s left wing politically correct weirdos, sickos and freaks” ?


Maybe it will never be fully proven that Charles Manson was a fully fledged left wing politically correct Marxist Anti Fascist freak.

But one thing is for sure – just take a good long hard look at your typical present day left wing politically correct Anti Fascist Marxist sicko. – They have Manson written all over them !

Typical looking present day left wing sicko, it just cannot be ignored.

Just how far within British and American society do these left wing politically correct Anti Fascist Marxist freaks go ?

1069249_486693894752063_1020417221_n (1)

Charles Manson

Born in Ohio in 1934, Charles Manson is notoriously connected to the brutal slayings of actress Sharon Tate and other Hollywood residents, but was never actually found guilty of committing the murders himself. However, he is still associated with several brutal slayings including the famous ‘Tate-La Bianca’ killings that have immortalized him as a living embodiment of evil. Images of his staring ‘mad eyes’ are still used today to illustrate countless serial-murder news stories. The Manson Family—including Charles Manson and his young, loyal drop-out disciples of murder—is thought to have carried out some 35 killings. Most were never tried, either for lack of evidence or because the perpetrators were already sentenced to life for the Tate/La Bianca killings. In May 2007, Manson was denied parole for the 11th time.

Early Life

Charles Manson was born Charles Milles Maddox on November 12, 1934, in Cincinnati, Ohio, to Kathleen Maddox, a 16-year-old girl who was both an alcoholic and prostitute. Kathleen later married William Manson, but the marriage ended quickly and Charles was placed in a boys school. Despite running back to his mother, she didn’t want anything to do with him. Charles was soon living on the streets and getting by through petty crime.

By 1952, Manson was soon spending more time in prison. In total he spent more than half his life (17 years) incarcerated. He was noted for being a ‘model prisoner’.

A new chapter in his life began in 1955 when he married a 17 year old girl and moved with her to California. She became pregnant, but Manson resumed a life of crime again, this time stealing cars. It wasn’t long before he was back behind bars and by 1956 his estranged wife had left with their child and her new lover. Manson later had another child with a different girl while out on probation.

Petty Crimes

He was described by probation reports as suffering from a ‘marked degree of rejection, instability and psychic trauma’ and ‘constantly striving for status and securing some kind of love’. Other descriptions included ‘dangerous’ ‘unpredictable’ and ‘safe only under supervision’.

From 1958, Manson was in and out of jail for a variety of offenses including ‘pimping’ and passing stolen checks. He was sent to McNeil Island prison in Washington State for ten years. During this time he had also raped a fellow male prisoner while brandishing a razor. Paradoxically, it was whilst he was incarcerated that he tapped into his creative talents and learnt how to read music and play the guitar. He was finally released on March 21, 1967.

Helter Skelter

The following year he was to spearhead a murderous campaign that would make him one of the most infamous figures in criminal history.

In many ways Manson reflects personality traits and obsessions that are associated with gurus of cult-quasi-religious groups that began to emerge in the 60’s and are still with us today. He was pathologically deluded into believing that he was harbinger of doom regarding the planet’s future, in much the same way that cult and evangelist figures today claim prophetic knowledge of the world’s end.

Manson was also influenced, not only by drugs such as LSD, but by art works and music of the time such as The Beatles song ‘Helter Skelter’ from their White Album. He had a strong belief and interest in the notion of Armageddon from the Book of Revelations. Scientology and more obscure cult churches such as Church of the Final Judgement were also fleeting interests.

After 1967 Manson gathered a group of followers who shared his passion for an unconventional lifestyle and habitual use of hallucinogenic drugs, such as LSD and magic mushrooms. ‘The Family’ as they became known moved to San Francisco and later to a deserted ranch in the San Fernando Valley. His followers, numbering around a hundred also included a small hard-core unit of impressionable young girls. They began to believe, without question, Manson’s claims that he was Jesus and his prophecies of a race war.

In August 1969 a series of Hollywood murders were to shock the world and tarnish the 60’s free love and peace legacy. Manson gathered a group of his most loyal Family followers to carry out a massacre among Tinseltown’s elite and ‘beautiful people’.


The first victims on the August 9, 1969 were guests at Roman Polanski’s Beverley Hills home at 10050 Cielo Drive, that included Sharon Tate the film director’s seven months pregnant wife. The following day Manson instigated another killing spree, this time at the home of wealthy couple Leno LaBianca and his wife, Rosemary.

Manson chose four of his most obedient comrades, Charles ‘Tex’ Watson, Susan Watkins, Patricia Krenwinkel and Linda Kasabian, to carry out these heinous crimes. Kasabian acted as the getaway driver and was to become the star witness during the trial.

The victims; actress Sharon Tate, writer Wojciech Frykowski and his partner the coffee bean heiress Abigail Folger, together with celerity hairstylist Jay Sebring, had all returned to the Polanski residence after dining out. Polanksi himself was away in London shooting a film.

Manson himself took no part in the actual killings, but directed his murderous disciples to the address and instructed them to kill everyone. The first victim was 18-year-old Steven Parent who was a friend of Tate’s gardener. He was shot as he just happened to walk down the drive and noticed the intruders.

Linda Kasabian was horrified by the shooting of the boy. She remained outside to keep watch. When the other three broke into the house they herded the occupants into the living room and tied them up.

Jay Sebring was shot and brutally kicked as he tried to defend Ms Tate. During the terrifying fracas both Frykowski and Folger managed to escape from the house but were chased and stabbed to death. At the trial Kasabian described how she saw Frykowski staggering out of the house covered in blood and was horrified at the sight. She told him she was ‘sorry’, but despite her pleas to his attacker to stop, the victim was bludgeoned repeatedly. Folger herself having escaped from the house with terrible injuries was caught on the front lawn and stabbed 28 times.

The most inhumane killing had to be of Sharon Tate, who despite pleading for the life of her unborn child was mercilessly stabbed in the stomach by Susan Atkins. Kasabian told of Atkins’ chilling words to Tate before she stabbed her.

“Look bitch, I have no mercy for you. You’re going to die and you’d better get used to it”

Atkins then used Tate’s blood to write the word ‘PIG’ on the front door.

Instead of this brutal massacre sating the pathological Manson, he instead criticized the murderers for being sloppy. The following night on the August 10, 1969, he took Family members Watson, Patricia Krenwinkel and Leslie Van Houten to the Los Feliz district address of wealthy supermarket executive Leno LaBianca and his wife, Rosemary.

Arrest and Trial

Ironically, Manson and his Family were arrested not on suspicion of the murders but simply on the belief that they had vandalized a portion of the Death Valley National Park while they were hiding out in the Mojave Desert. In 1969, the local county sheriff had them in custody not realizing that he had murder suspects on their hands. But it was the confessions of Susan Atkins, while held in detention on suspicion of murdering Gary Hinman, that led detectives to realize that Manson and his followers were involved in the Tate/La Bianca killings.

Various motivations were examined during the course of the trial. The most feasible being that Manson’s pathological ego, insanity and belief in Armageddon were influences that led him to carry out a trail of destruction.

Manson believed that he was the new Messiah and that after a ‘nuclear attack’ he and his followers would be saved by hiding in a secret world under the desert. His prophetic visions included a belief that after the race war ‘blacks’ would triumph. Manson along with his ‘Family’ members would have to mentor the black community as they would ‘lack experience’ to run the planet.

As Manson and the Family were to be the beneficiaries of the race war, he told his followers that they had to help initiate it. According to defense witness and killer Van Houten, this was the primary reason why they murdered the LaBiancas. Manson had taken the wallet of murdered Rosemary Bianca with the intention that he would deposit it in a section of LA, where a person of ethnic origin might find it, use it and then possibly have the murders pinned on them.

Later in court Van Houten, who was just nineteen when she took part in the LaBianca killings, alleged that Manson had taken advantage of her vulnerability and dislike for her mother. She believed, like the other members, that he was a man of vision.

Thirty years later during a parole board she was to say that she was horrified by what she had done that night and desperately wanted to redeem herself. Van Houten was denied parole in 2006, and again in 2010.

Susan Atkins, possibly the most disturbed of all the killers, admitted in initial confessions to fellow prisoners that she had wanted to cut out Tate’s unborn baby, but didn’t have the time. Other grisly and macabre acts were to be perpetrated against the victims. Atkins also revealed that a list of other high profile Hollywood stars were on a list to be killed and mutilated. These included Elizabeth Taylor and husband Richard Burton, Frank Sinatra, Steve McQueen and Tom Jones. When asked why they wanted to kill such people, Atkins replied that they (Manson and Family) wanted to commit murders that would shock the world and make people take notice.

The trial began on the November 18, 1969. Ronald Hughes was a young lawyer with experience and knowledge of 1960’s counter culture. He was assigned as Manson and Van Houten’s attorney, but decided to drop Manson in favor of defending Van Houten who he thought could convince the jury that she was under the influence of Manson. The move may have cost him his life. In 1970, Hughes went camping and disappeared. His decomposed body was found several months later. It is thought he was the victim of ‘retaliation killing’ by members of Manson’s Family for, in their eyes, betraying their leader.

During the trial, Manson released an album titled Lie in an effort to raise money for his defense. Manson reveled in media attention and during court proceedings turned up with an X carved into his forehead. Some of his female followers copied the act and shaved their heads, sometimes sitting outside the court house. The X was gradually modified until it turned into a swastika.

Throughout the trial the killers often giggled and exchanged grimaces with Manson. They showed no remorse for their crimes.

On January 25, 1971, Manson was convicted of first degree murder for directing the deaths of the Tate/La Bianca victims. He was sentenced to death but this was automatically commuted to life in prison after the Californian’s Supreme Court invalidated all death sentences prior to 1972.

Kasabian was granted immunity for her part in acting as star witness. Susan Atkins was sentenced to death, but was later commuted to life in prison. She was incarcerated from 1969 until her death in 2009.


One interesting aspect to this disturbing saga was the emergence of record producer Terry Melcher, son of Doris Day and friend/producer of popular ’60s band the Beach Boys. Before the Manson Family’s murderous spree, Dennis Wilson of the Beach Boys had allowed Manson and several members of his Family to stay at his home after picking up two female members of the Family who’d been hitchhiking. It was through this association that Manson got the opportunity to audition for Melcher, who was living at Polanski’s house at the time. Melcher wasn’t interested in signing a contract with Manson. However, Manson allegedly did record some music at Dennis’s brother, Brian Wilson’s home studio, and the Beach Boys released a song written by Manson entitled “Cease To Exist” (renamed “Never Learn Not To Love”) on their 1969 album, 20/20, as a single B-side.

According to one of the Family member’s statements, the Polanksi household had been targeted because it ‘represented’ Manson’s rejection by the showbiz world and society.

The original house owned by the Polanksi’s at 10050 Cielo Drive has since been demolished. The property that replaced it still stands empty. No agents will include it on their books.

Life in Prison

Manson is serving his time in Corcoran State Prison in California. Even behind bars, he has still managed to attract followers. A woman named Afton Burton, who calls herself Star, claimed that she and Manson are in a relationship. In an 2013 interview with Rolling Stone magazine, she said that “I’ll tell you straight up, Charlie and I are going to get married. When that will be, we don’t know. But I take it very seriously. Charlie is my husband. Charlie told me to tell you this.”

At the age of 19, Star moved from Illinois to Corcoran, California, to be near the prison where Manson is incarcerated. In November 2014, 26-year-old Star and 80-year-old Manson got a marriage license. Star also runs several websites aimed at getting Manson released from prison.

Anti Fascist Network Exposed Again For Left Wing Sick Sex Crimes


Another case of shocking left wing Anti Fascist perversion and evil political correctness sickness.

James Warmer

Labour Party election candidate James Warmer who filmed up underage girl’s skirts escaped jail this week, but he must take part in a three-year sexual treatment program me.

Norwich Crown Court was shown CCTV footage of Craig Warmer, 22, stooping down to lift up an under age girl’s skirt and then filming it at Boots in Castle Mall, Norwich.

The court heard that Warmer had lifted another girl’s skirt outside a school, and had sexually assaulted a female he followed in Dereham.

Warmer, of Hyde Road, Dereham, appeared at Norwich Crown Court for sentencing, after pleading guilty at an earlier hearing to two counts of outraging public decency and one count of sexual assault.

He was handed a community order with three years’ supervision and the requirement to attend the Thames Valley sex offender group work treatment program. A sexual offences prevention order was also made for three years, and he was placed on the sexual offenders’ register for the same amount of time.

Prosecutor, Christopher Morgan said the first offence took place in Dereham on November 27 last year. “Warmer started walking behind a young female before grabbing her buttock hard in Sandy Lane,” he said. She took a photograph of his back, and DNA from her coat matched Warmer’s.

The next two offences took place while he was on bail. A girl was walking to school from Castle Meadow on January 30.

As she got to the school gate she was aware that her skirt was being lifted up, so she tried to put it down. The man lifted it up again and he kept hold of it.

The last incident took place in Boots on February 2. Mr Morgan said: “The defendant was seen on CCTV to lift up a girl’s skirt in the aisle, and then film it on his iPhone.” The girl was underage.

Jonathan Morgans, for Warmer, said he had strong family support. He said his “bizarre deviancies” showed he had no control of his desires, but added he wanted to make sure it did not happen again.

1069249_486693894752063_1020417221_n (1)

Do you know or suspect an Anti Fascist left wing sex pervert who may have access to Children ?

Here is a list of known Anti Fascist Anti British left wing organisations, and one that may be near you.

If you know of somebodies involvement with one of these sick groups and you may be concerned over a Child’s safety who that person may have access to, then please inform the police or local authorities now. Please check the list below and then your friends lists for possible members.


AFA Ireland
Anti-Fascist Action for Greece
Anti-Fascist Archive
Anti-Fascists Online
Antifa Channel Islands
Antifa North Wales
Antifa Surrey
Belfast Antifa
Bradford Anti-Fascist Network
Bristol Anti-Fascist Co-operative
Cambridge Anti-Fascists
Derry Anti-Fascists
East Midlands Anti-Fascists
EDL News
Exposing the EDL
Grantham Solidarity Network
Hastings Anarchists
Lincoln Against Racism and Fascism
Malatesta’s Blog
North West Anti-Fascists
North West London Anti-Fascists
Northumberland Antifa
Norwich Anti-Fascists
Nottingham Anti-Fascists
Oxford Anti-Fascists
Plymouth Anti-Fascists
Portsmouth Nazi Watch
Scotland United Against the Racist SDL
Stand Against Fascism
Stop MFE
Support the Tower Hamlets 286
UK Aktion
Welsh Anti-Fascist Action
West London Anti-Fascists
West Midlands Anti-Fascists
West Yorkshire 161 Crew
Wolverhampton Anti-Fascists
Worthing Anarchists

Labour Starts To Fall Apart And So Do The Politically Correct Anti Fascists


The Labour Party Was Warned By Ex Prime Minister Tony Blair That It Would Be Finished if it leaned too far to the left.

Recently we have seen the dramatic turn in the public mood, and the people are not being fooled any more by politically correct nonsense and Marxist brainwashing, bullying, manipulation or intimidation by left wing politically correct Anti Fascist bullies and Marxist thugs who parade in the form of Anti Fascist organisations that say they are all for equality.

When in actual fact they stir race hate in communities by continuously bringing attention to race with politically correct bullying by calling decent British Citizens fascists and racists if they do not agree with them or follow their vile twisted dictates and unjust unequal immoral rules and P.C twisted ideology.

The days of the left wing Anti Fascist bullies is well and truly coming to an end.


Just take a look on Twitter or Facebook, and you will very quickly realise that the left wing Anti Fascist profiles are all anonymous and hidden. Nobody knows who is running them, and the admins are ‘hiding’ behind the anonymous profiles, but quite readily they are letting poor unsuspecting ‘followers’ comment and ‘support’ their disgusting ideology as they try to make themselves ‘seem’ popular and moralistic by spewing left wing politically correct garbage and rubbish, but behind the scenes they are attacking people and posting vicious rumours and lies in a typical politically correct fashion of trying to squash and remove any questioning of left wing false morality and politically correct nonsense and Marxist rubbish and lies.

But their whole rotten lair is beginning to fall apart and crumble.

More and more people are becoming aware of what has been going on, even the Anti Fascist anonymous profiles are now starting to get edgy and worried, paranoid and scared as they start to even attack each other and accuse one of being the other.

They know that others close to them who they have let in the secret of what they are doing on line know who they are.

It is only a matter of time before somebody cracks and spills the beans.

Then the whole rotten structure will come tumbling down as the rats run and scatter for the hills.

There have been a lot of people hurt and targeted by these parasites, and there will be an awful lot of people wanting justice when the ring leaders are exposed. We envision prosecutions far and wide when the police seize equipment and people behind these disgusting Anti Fascist profiles are publicly named as the people who have caused so much harm, so much hatred and so much division.

They must be exposed and brought to trial.


The Labour Party is now seen by the people for what it really is

Tony Blair's autobiography, A Journey, is set to become the biggest political memoir of all-time, according to
Tony Blair warned Ed Miliband that if he took the Party to the Left then it would be finished.

Nobody likes left wing politically correct Marxists, and apparently even Tony Blair was sceptical of Ed Miliband’s Marxist leaning. Tony Blair warned Ed Miliband not to allow Labour to drift to the left under his leadership and declared that the party must continue to modernise in order to regain power.

The former Prime Minister insisted that Mr Miliband enjoyed his “100 per cent” support but said that reverting to a more traditional Labour approach might appear backward-looking to the voters the party needs to win over.

Mr Blair broke his recent silence on Labour’s internal debates in the introduction to the new paperback edition of his memoirs, A Journey.


Blairites have been reluctant to rock the boat since Mr Miliband defeated their favoured candidate, his brother David, to win the Labour leadership. But privately, some in the faction are becoming restless about what they describe as Ed Miliband’s failure to set out a clear vision of where he will take the party.

Left Wing Politically Correct Marxism.

In his book, Mr Blair argues that traditional left-right boundaries are breaking down and that to be successful, today’s politicians need to “rise above partisan politics”. This reflects fears among Blairites that David Cameron, an admirer of Mr Blair’s strategy, is more likely to appear above the traditional left-right fray than Ed Miliband, who is seen by voters as to the left of his party.

Mr Blair argues that New Labour, Bill Clinton’s “new Democrats” and Barack Obama all reached out beyond their traditional support base and suggests the Coalition Government is trying to do the same. “Where political leaders deliberately go outside their own political base, they almost always win public approval,” he says. “Face people with a choice between traditional left and traditional right and there is a traditional outcome: the left loses.”

On policy, Mr Blair emphasises the need for tax rates to be competitive. He would not have introduced the 50p new top rate brought in by his successor, Gordon Brown, which Ed Miliband wants to keep for the forseeable future. “High taxes on income reduce the incentive to work,” he writes.

His book describes voters as “radical, not ideological.” He says: “People want government that works, that is above all effective in making change. To achieve this, governments have to liberate themselves from ideology based on left/right and embrace new ways of thinking that cross the traditional party lines.”

He adds: “Of course there are voters who remain absolutely committed to traditional left/right politics – often they make most noise – but there is a swelling crowd of people who don’t conform to such politics and who can determine elections.”

In a hint of his views about Labour’s decision to opt for Ed rather than David Miliband, Mr Blair says that party activists who choose leaders are more wedded to ideologically-driven politics than the voters are. He believes the public will vote for big change but “won’t buy it from someone who they regard as ideologically motivated”.

In a round of media interviews yesterday, Mr Blair appeared sceptical about the “Blue Labour” traditional values being pushed on Mr Miliband by some advisers. “It [Labour] won’t win by a Labour equivalent of warm beer and old maids bicycling,” he said.

Admitting there was “a risk” of Labour turning back to left-wing policies, he said: “There is a pattern that the Labour Party and indeed other progressive parties follow – they lose an election then they go off to the left, but I meet a lot of the younger Labour people now and that gives you great cause for optimism about the future.

“I think he [Ed Miliband] has perfectly sensibly created some space for himself now to put forward policy and my only statement on this is that progressive parties win when they’re at the cutting edge of the future, when they’re modernisers.”

Denying that he had become a “pariah” in his home country, Mr Blair said: “I think it’s a little harsh to say that. One of the things you learn in politics is the fact that you get a hundred people or a thousand people, or even 10,000 people out on the street doesn’t mean to say the whole of the population thinks that way. You know, I did win three elections in Britain.”

Leaked files put Ed Balls at heart of plot to oust Blair

The shadow Chancellor, Ed Balls, was at the centre of an attempt to broker a deal between Gordon Brown and Tony Blair to allow the Chancellor to become prime minister, leaked documents reveal.

Files, held by Mr Balls and leaked to The Daily Telegraph, reveal that in February 2006, Mr Blair sent Mr Brown an unsigned letter setting out terms of a proposed deal for him to assume the leadership.

“You (understandably) want me to go now,” he wrote.

“You need to be the candidate of continuity and change. The second will be relatively easy to do.

“The first, however, rests on a smooth transition. Critical to that is not merely the absence of disunity in the handover; it is also the visible, clear demonstration that the person who most embodies NL [New Labour], ie me, is working hand in hand with the successor.”

He suggests a five-point deal that includes Mr Brown leading on party reform, democratic renewal and work to tackle Islamic extremism.

Mr Blair concludes that “in return” he would need “full help and co-operation in getting through his own reform agenda: NHS, schools, respect, welfare and energy”.

On a copy of the letter he passed to Mr Balls, Mr Brown scribbled “shallow”, “inconsistent” and “muddled”.

In a draft of a deal document sent to Mr Blair, Mr Brown set out the need for written six-month, 12-month and two-year plans, and a written agreement for strategy to deal with David Cameron. He also demanded a role in cabinet reshuffles and that he attend international meetings.

Mr Blair, who is understood to have been incensed by the rudeness of Mr Balls, rejected the proposals.

The talks were the culmination of more than six months of plotting by the Brownites known as Project Volvo. The files show that the plot began on 19 July 2005, less than a fortnight after the terror attacks on London. Mr Balls had become an MP only at the election in May.

Three Suspected Members of a Left Wing Anti Fascist Group in Evil Axe Killing


Three teenagers suspected by the Daily Bale to be Members of a left wing Anti Fascist group have been found guilty of a sick left wing axe killing, that could of been termed a race hate crime if it was the other way round, but it wasn’t the other way round, so its just a killing in the eyes of left wing politically correct Anti British Anti Fascist Marxist monsters.

The three teenagers were found guilty of murdering Paul Thrower with an axe at a block of flats in Hayes (Picture: Metropolitan Police)

Three evil leftist teenagers have been found guilty of killing a man in a horrific axe and knife attack at a block of flats in west London after he confronted them for spitting at his respectable hard working Patriotic right wing kind friendly loving girlfriend the Daily Bale believes.

Another sad victim of left wing Anti Fascism and multicultural Britain, Paul Thrower was killed after confonting the teenagers over anti-social behaviour in February this year, but this sort of behaviour is excused or ignored by left wing politically correct left wing apologists of violent crime who always put the criminals rights first

Another sad victim of left wing Anti Fascism in multicultural Britain, Paul Thrower was killed after confronting the teenagers over anti-social left wing behaviour in February this year, but this sort of behaviour is daily excused or ignored by left wing politically correct left wing apologists of violent crime who always put the criminals rights first and try to say it’s not their fault.

Sad victim Paul Thrower died after two 18-year-olds hacked at him with a 4ft-long axe and stabbed him 10 times on a balcony in Hayes on February 20 this year.

They claimed they acted in self defence when the victim came at them in a rage, but following a trial at the Old Bailey, Kiro Halliburton, who delivered the fatal knife wound, was found guilty of murder.

Zakariya Subeir and an accomplice, Mahdi Osman, also 18, were convicted of manslaughter today.

The court heard how the victim had been drinking and became very angry when his girlfriend told him the youths swore, spat and threw a drink at her earlier in the day.

When Mr Thrower confronted them, Subeir and Halliburton shut themselves into a bin chute on a first-floor communal balcony at St Dunstan’s Close.

As he hammered on the glass partition an axe was passed up to them from a shed – but Osman told the court he only handed it to Subeir and Hamilton so they could barricade themselves in and not to attack the 46-year-old handyman.

But when Mr Thrower smashed the reinforced glass and began to crawl through the gap, Subeir hit him twice on the head and once on the shoulder with the axe and Halliburton stabbed him repeatedly in the back with a knife.

The victim managed to wrestle the axe from them and emerged from the bin chute covered in blood, but collapsed and died from a stab to the heart as the defendants ran away.

The Old Bailey heard to try and evade police Halliburton, of Tollgate Drive, Hayes, shaved off his plaits and fled to Leeds, while Subeir, of Rockingham Road, Uxbridge, flew to Somalia via Dubai.

But today, along with Osman, of Hoskins Close, Hayes, they were found guilty – and await sentencing by Judge John Bevan on Friday, December 19.

The investigating officer – Detective Inspector Simon Deefholts from Homicide and Major Crime Command – said he was pleased the trio were convicted of the ‘shocking’ attack, calling the injuries inflicted on Mr Thrower ‘devastating’.

He acknowledged the victim was ‘undoubtedly angry that day’, but said the defendants chose not to escape over the roof behind them and instead stay and attack him.

Baljit Ubhey, London’s Chief Crown Prosecutor, said after today’s verdicts: “These three teenagers have now been made to face the consequences of their actions and I hope this provides some small comfort to Mr Thrower’s family.

“Our thoughts are with them at this time.”

• A 17 year-old male from the Hayes area, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was found not guilty of manslaughter

Labour Mass Immigration Ruined Britain. We Need Ukip Conservative Coalition – ConservUkip


Mass immigration, and how Labour tried to destroy Britishness and bring the U.K to its knees.

Only a solid right wing Patriotic People’s Party can turn this mess around.

The Conservative Party has no other choice – they must do a deal with Ukip and stop the left wing Labour madness from ever happening again.

We must have a “Conserv-Ukip” Government.

We have to deal with the left wing menace once and for all and form a rock solid coalition against the insanity of left wing political correctness and the culture of left wing Anti British Marxism.


Throughout the tenure of the last Labour government the Daily Bale and many other mainstream news outlets — while praising the huge contribution immigrants had made to this country in the ‘past’ — we must attack the laxity of what were supposed to be our border controls.

It was clear the very nature of our society was being changed by a new kind of uncontrolled mass immigration — and without the British people ever having been asked whether they supported the policy.

Immigrants eating food by railway sidings in Calais

Labour arrogantly accused its critics of racism — though most of the incomers were white.

It claimed it had no choice but to open our borders to the nationals of ten mainly ex-Soviet bloc countries which joined the EU in 2004.

The truth was that — as other EU countries which restricted immigration from these states proved — it did have a choice.


The cynicism did not end there. Such, Labour claimed, was its commitment to ensuring that only people with a right to be in Britain could come here that in 2008 it set up the UK Border Agency. The truth, unfortunately, was very different.

Theresa May, the Home Secretary, has announced that the agency is being wound up next month precisely because it is useless, and the officials who ran it — rather like the borders they supposedly policed — were out of control.

Despite the strong threat from international terrorism, the evidence of eastern European criminal gangs infiltrating Britain, and our overburdened public and social services, 500,000 unchecked people were let in to Britain via Eurostar between 2007 and last year, while countless so-called students were just nodded through.


Though Labour clearly left the system in a shambles, it should be noted that it has taken almost two years for this Government to admit the mess our immigration procedures are in, and to do something about it.

So Mrs May’s department — and notably the Immigration Minister Damian Green — also have a case to answer.

They seemed unaware that their officials, too, were ordering the relaxation of controls. Yet while the Coalition has been derelict, Labour was downright malign.

The game was given away in 2009 by Andrew Neather, a former Labour Home Office and Downing Street adviser, who revealed that mass immigration was a deliberate policy by the Left to change the social fabric of the country and to ‘rub the Right’s nose in diversity’.


This appalling policy was never discussed publicly because Labour strategists feared it would upset the party’s traditional white working-class support. For self-interested political reasons, the public could not possibly be consulted.

Mass immigration gratified the Left in two ways that have inflicted enormous damage on our country. It furthered the bogus notion of multiculturalism — undermining national identity and common values, and preventing the successful integration of immigrant communities into the British cultural mainstream.

Moreover, at a time of growing economic crisis, it added an enormous number of people to Labour’s client state.


Recent immigrants were grateful for their admission to the country, and for the costly safety net of the welfare state that was provided for them: a gratitude that, Labour hoped, would help it garner more votes at elections.

That aside, it is generally accepted that new arrivals to a country — who are often relatively impoverished — are more likely to vote for Leftish governments.

So although present ministers have much explaining to do, this cocktail of ideology and blatant gerrymandering is of the Left’s making.

In the interests of creating a society with which Leftist ideologues felt comfortable, and which would help shore up Labour’s vote at elections, the wishes of the vast majority of the British people, and their security, were ridden roughshod over.


The idea of multiculturalism was advanced with varying degrees of stealth over several decades by politicians, civil servants and council officials. Its doctrine was spread in schools and in teacher-training colleges.

Weak as it so often is, the Church of England appeared to welcome it, even though it posed a mortal threat to that institution. The BBC, never to be found wanting when political correctness was required, suppressed any debate about mass immigration, took the tenets of multiculturalism as its gospel and preached it to the nation.

Internationalism is one of the core principles of the Left. It abhors the nation state, which it sees as a foundry of bigotry, racism and aggressive nationalism.


The Left has always understood this: that if you manage to wreck a national culture and a national identity, you shatter the ties of history and nationhood forged over centuries.


Although there used to be patriotic Leftists — and there still are one or two — many in the New Labour project in the Nineties and Noughties were, effectively, self-hating Britons.

They tortured themselves with post-imperial guilt, wanted the country to lose its independence and be ruled by Brussels, and sought to have what a BBC executive called the ‘hideously white’ mainstream culture diluted by ‘diversity’.


This was immensely dangerous. In a world where even Trevor Phillips, the chairman of the Equality Commission, highlights the threat that multiculturalism poses to social cohesion, it is surprising it has taken ministers so long to become alert to this danger.

However one of them, at last, has. Eric Pickles, the Communities Secretary, has said that the culture of the majority will once more be given pre-eminence in society.

This is utterly sensible and, indeed, indispensable if we wish for a coherent and settled society of shared values.


To promote — as opposed to tolerate — the practices of other cultures is to drive people into ghettos.

It prevents integration and assimilation and causes strife in society between religious and social groups who find themselves gazing at one another suspiciously across the social divides created by multiculturalism.

Mr Pickles has specified what this assault on multiculturalism will mean. He has said that public bodies’ obsession with translating leaflets into all known languages — and spending a fortune in public money on doing so — should end.

Learning English is one of the fundamentals of grasping the British way of life.
He has argued that tolerance of the beliefs of others should not extend to disowning those of the majority.

He deplored the disciplining of Christian workers who wear crucifixes, and the recent decision to ban prayers before the meetings of a town council in Devon. He has called all these issues ‘the politics of division’, and he is right

Great personalities like Joshua Bonehill of the Daily Bale have appeared to expose and speak out against the immorality of left wing political correctness and to express the public anger at immigration brought about by left wing P.C cranks and fruitbats.


In a society that remains more than 90 per cent indigenously British, it is ludicrous to be ashamed of national traditions, rooted in common values from a shared past.

And it is entirely right to expect those who come here to accept those values and traditions, and not be made — usually by mischievous, politically-motivated white liberals — to feel hostile towards them.

When even many atheists recognise the central importance of Christianity to the culture and institutions of our country — and I am one of them — it is offensive to the intellect as well as to the spiritual to seek to downgrade or marginalise that faith.

Our society needs an end to mass immigration.

Parties like Ukip are now rising fast by popular public support.

This is not just because the parts of the country where immigrants most wish to settle are overcrowded, and the public services and infrastructure are cracking under the strain, or because we have 2.7  million unemployed.

It is principally because our national identity — founded on Christian values of tolerance and decency, and on a history of which we can be exceptionally proud — has been gravely injured by Britain’s Left-wing enemy within, and needs to recover from its wounds.

The best way to guarantee a harmonious future for all our people, of whatever racial background, is to make that culture strong again, and for us all to embrace it.

Ukip Conservative Coalition But Labour Never Again in Our Name


IT was the father of the evil left wing political correctness ideology of communism Karl Marx who observed that history repeats itself first as tragedy and the second time as farce.

There’s nothing remotely funny about the way British political history is repeating itself so prepare for tragedy if a Labour Government ever wins power again within the U.K

Labour ruined the economy last time they were in office, also they opened our borders to millions of benefit scroungers and criminals without telling us they were doing it or even asking us if we even wanted these ‘People’ coming here. There was enforced the weird sick twisted communist ideology of Political Correctness with all its unjust, unfair, Anti British and Anti White undemocratic dictates and its vile bullying, manipulation, intimidation and crushing of the democratic freedom of speech that our fathers and forefathers fought so hard to preserve and keep.

What are we left with today we ask after the Labour years of politically correct purges ?

1069249_486693894752063_1020417221_n (1)

Today we are left with a creepy small bunch of weird sick Anti British left wing politically correct misfits, drop outs and long haired unwashed thugs who call themselves Anti Fascists, who go round dictating to the majority on how we are to think, talk, behave, and act in Society and telling us how we are all horrid racists and fascists for being British and even worse if you are white.

These weirdos and sickos are the aftermath of the Labour years, a bit like the gasses left over from a dying star that exploded and then imploded on itself into an empty black hole of nothingness and just a sad memory.

We must stamp out this evil sickness within our midsts and expose the wicked evil people peddling this vile disgusting politically correct communist criminal nonsense and left wing Anti Fascist Anti British criminal treason and destruction of our culture and identity as a people.

We must get back to being British, and we must ban and outlaw all criminal Anti Fascist left wing Anti British political correctness thug groups that still exist and who try to force P.C criminality onto normal decent British People.


Thirty five years ago this week the Winter of Discontent was unleashed on us. Militant unions brought the country to its knees with strike after strike as they demanded pay rises as high as 25 per cent. Rubbish piled up in the streets, ambulance drivers refused to collect the sick, nurses walked out and the dead went unburied as grave-diggers downed tools.

If you’re under 50 it’s hard to imagine what a desperate mess the country was in. A weak Labour government wanted to limit pay rises to five per cent but was powerless to control its union paymasters and over the next three months almost 30million working days were lost to strikes.


The communists and Trotskyists, who controlled the unions, showed their ugly, snarling face and voters were so appalled that Labour was kicked out and Margaret Thatcher voted in to begin her remarkable transformation of our country.


Young Ed Miliband had his ninth birthday midway through the Winter of Discontent so it’s highly likely he was indoctrinated in the rights of socialism and the wrongs of capitalism as he sat on his father’s knee.

Certainly he has learned nothing to persuade him of the folly of governments interfering in free market economics. Tomorrow Miliband makes his first major speech since his promise to the Labour conference in September that he was bringing back socialism, a speech which the head of the CBI says made the hairs on his neck stand on end.

Miliband will be pandering to union bosses, who made him Labour leader, by attacking low wages and promising to force companies to pay workers more if he becomes prime minister.

“We need the kind of strong increases in wages that will genuinely make people all across Britain better off,” he will say.

It’s an ill-conceived policy of juvenile proportions, dreamed up by a man who fails to grasp that businesses create wealth by being set free from state control, not by having extra costs imposed on them. Trying to camouflage the reality with a half-baked tax break fools no one.


Miliband and sidekick Ed Balls have spent three years talking the country down, blaming “savage Tory cuts” and promoting the recklessness that borrowing even more is the answer. They suffer from what Michael Howard so aptly calls “spending amnesia”.

“Labour boasted that they had ended boom and bust,” he says. “They claimed they had rewritten the rules of economics – in fact from 2002 the Labour government spent more than they received in taxation in every single year of office.”

Who was at Gordon Brown’s side in the Treasury at the time? Miliband and Balls.

Paradoxically the current issue of wages is the opposite of the one that brought down Labour in the Seventies. Then Jim Callaghan wanted to peg wages back, now Miliband wants to push them higher.

But there is one worrying similarity between then and now. In the Seventies men with communist sympathies led powerful unions that used forgery,
coercion, manipulation and bullying. Thirty five years later they still do.


We saw in the Grangemouth refinery dispute in Scotland that the Unite union, led by Mad Dog McCluskey, will stop at nothing to get its way. Mobs besieged the homes of refinery bosses, scaring the living daylights out of their wives and children.


This was no isolated incident for it emerges that 65 other locations have received the attentions of Unite’s flying squads: family homes, hotels, businesses, even a charity fun run have been targeted. One former Labour parliamentary candidate has torn up his Unite membership card in disgust at the “depressing, devious and combative way” the union conducts itself.

Jonathan Roberts writes on the Labour Uncut website: “If you think picketing the family homes of company bosses and intimidating their children, or putting hundreds of jobs at risk because one trade union official was under investigation for skiving at work, or ordering the PR team to ‘dig up the dirt’ on Labour MPs who disagree with union policy is a decent way of representing the workers then we’ll have to agree to disagree.”

He adds it’s not solely Thatcherite reforms that have caused a dramatic fall in union membership but “the behaviour of certain union leaders that puts off millions of ordinary, decent people from joining. For shame.”


Miliband admits there are “bad practices” but he’s too weak to do anything about them. He won’t act on the scandal in Falkirk, where Unite is alleged to have corruptly rigged the selection of its own candidate for the safe Labour seat.

Miliband refuses to publish an internal inquiry report into what went on in Falkirk. Since Unite is by far the biggest financial donor to the Labour Party it’s not hard to see why.


One accusation is that Miliband’s former campaigns chief Tom Watson was behind the “Falkirk fix”, which Watson denies. I make no comment on Watson’s guilt or innocence except to say that if I had to choose between being trapped in a lift with him or a skunk then the skunk would win hands down.

Come the general election in 2015 there will be one question to answer: do you want a government of economic fools who are the puppets of corrupt union bullies? If so vote Labour.


If not, then vote Ukip.


Alec Woodward